Lloyd Harris vs Ivan Gakhov — Alicante CH Round of 32

Alicante CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Lloyd Harris
RSA
Lloyd Harris
#160ATP
1665ELO
1566Clay ELO
$130kYTD
$4.7MCAREER
29 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWLL
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 23 March 2026
clay
Ivan Gakhov
RUS
Ivan Gakhov
#387ATP
1430ELO
1384Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLWL
Harris L.
6-3 0-0
Gakhov I.
Harris L.
60–
Gakhov I.
30–

Lloyd Harris advanced when Ivan Gakhov retired 6-3 0-0 in the Alicante CH round of 32.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Harris L.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Gakhov I.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Harris L.

Serve advantage — Harris L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Harris L.Gakhov I.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
46%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Clear edge
67%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
9.3
6.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.1
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (19 vs 16). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Harris L.Gakhov I.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
57
34
Break points saved·Clear edge
95
82
Break points won·Clear edge
24
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
59
Tiebreaks·Even
25
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Harris L.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Gakhov I.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.4+182 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.6Clay Elo 1384
8.1Overall Elo 1665
ELO gap
1.9Overall Elo 1430
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.2
Surface form
3.4
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.3
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Llamas Ruiz P.
Carreno Busta P.[5]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Carreno Busta P.[5]
Ofner S.[1]
3-66-36-4
Llamas Ruiz P.
Safiullin R.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Ofner S.[1]
Cecchinato M.
7-667-5
Carreno Busta P.[5]
Martinez P.[4]
6-44-66-4
Safiullin R.
Houkes M.
6-46-1
Llamas Ruiz P.
Butvilas E.
6-16-2
R16
Llamas Ruiz P.
Blanch D.
6-16-2
Butvilas E.
De Jong J.[2]
7-52-66-4
Cecchinato M.
Harris L.
6-26-1
Ofner S.[1]
Moro Canas A.
7-656-4
Martinez P.[4]
Bertola R.
4-66-06-1
Carreno Busta P.[5]
Sanchez Quilez A.
3-67-56-3
Houkes M.
Gaubas V.[3]
6-776-47-64
Safiullin R.
Choinski J.[7]
6-26-3
R32
Moro Canas A.
Kolar Z.
6-42-66-0
Cecchinato M.
Lajovic D.[8]
7-56-3
Safiullin R.
Bailly G.
6-16-4
Gaubas V.[3]
Shelbayh A.
6-767-646-1
Sanchez Quilez A.
Montes De La Torre I.
6-36-0
Carreno Busta P.[5]
Gulin S.
7-56-1
Butvilas E.
Martin Tiffon P.
6-36-3
De Jong J.[2]
Pieri S.
5-76-17-62
Harris L.
Gakhov I.
6-30-0
Martinez P.[4]
Sanchez Jover C.
6-36-2
Bertola R.
Hassan B.
6-36-2
Ofner S.[1]
Skatov T.
6-36-4
Choinski J.[7]
Pereira T.
6-16-2
Houkes M.
Merida Aguilar D.
3-66-36-4
Llamas Ruiz P.
Ivashka I.
6-36-4
Blanch D.
Engel J.
6-26-1