Borna Gojo vs Juan Pablo Ficovich — Morelia CH Final

Morelia CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Borna Gojo
CRO8
Borna Gojo
#175ATP
1683ELO
1662Hard ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 March 2026
hard
Juan Pablo Ficovich
ARG
Juan Pablo Ficovich
#197ATP
1415ELO
1419Hard ELO
$100kYTD
$984kCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
Gojo B.
7-6 6-2
Ficovich J.
Gojo B.
7762
Ficovich J.
6520

Borna Gojo defeated Juan Pablo Ficovich 7-6 6-2 in the Morelia CH final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Borna Gojo closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gojo B.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Ficovich J.

Ficovich J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Serve advantage — Gojo B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gojo B.Ficovich J.
1st serve in·Even
65%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
80%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
69%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
67%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.6
5.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.9
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (25 vs 19). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gojo B.Ficovich J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
16
Break points saved·Clear edge
95
76
Break points won·Even
10
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
27
Tiebreaks·Dominant
73
5

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gojo B.
7.6
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Ficovich J.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.8+244 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.2Hard Elo 1419
7.9Overall Elo 1683
ELO gap
2.1Overall Elo 1415
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.4
Surface form
3.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 8
Fatigue & Travel
5.2
Minutes 14d
8.1
0.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gojo B.Ficovich J.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
80

Gojo B.: 18 days rest · Ficovich J.: 4 days rest · 1 match, 33 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Gojo B.[8]
Ficovich J.
7-656-2
Semi-finals
Gojo B.[8]
Mejia N.
6-47-65
Ficovich J.
Pavlovic L.
6-13-66-3
Quarter-finals
Mejia N.
Rodesch C.[6]
4-0
Gojo B.[8]
Pacheco Mendez R.
7-636-4
Ficovich J.
Schoolkate T.[3]
6-37-5
Pavlovic L.
Galarneau A.
7-654-67-65
R16
Ficovich J.
Mochizuki S.[5]
6-736-46-1
Pacheco Mendez R.
Duckworth J.[1]
7-646-3
Gojo B.[8]
Vandecasteele Q.
6-36-767-5
Mejia N.
Martin A.
6-46-4
Rodesch C.[6]
Polmans M.
6-46-4
Schoolkate T.[3]
Andrade A.
6-46-0
Galarneau A.
Yunchaokete B.[7]
7-606-4
Pavlovic L.
Magadan A.
6-46-3
R32
Gojo B.[8]
Krueger M.
7-656-4
Mejia N.
Wong C.[4]
7-57-62
Polmans M.
Mena F.
6-33-67-65
Mochizuki S.[5]
Smith K.
3-66-36-4
Schoolkate T.[3]
Catry R.
7-626-4
Galarneau A.
Tobon M.
7-642-66-3
Yunchaokete B.[7]
Wiskandt M.
7-56-4
Ficovich J.
Alves M.
6-36-1
Andrade A.
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-46-4
Vandecasteele Q.
Zhukayev B.
6-17-64
Pavlovic L.
Walton A.[2]
6-37-5
Martin A.
Kozlov S.
6-26-2
Duckworth J.[1]
Huesler M.
5-76-46-4
Pacheco Mendez R.
Ayeni O.
6-26-4
Rodesch C.[6]
Crawford O.
6-36-3
Magadan A.
Rubio Fierros A.
6-36-2