Mariano Tammaro vs Gianmarco Ferrari — Naples CH Qualifying Round 1

Naples CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
ITA
Mariano Tammaro
#1373ATP
22 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 23 March 2026
clay
ITA11
Gianmarco Ferrari
#415ATP
25 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLL
Tammaro M.
2-6 6-4 6-2
Ferrari G.
Tammaro M.
2662
Ferrari G.
6421

Mariano Tammaro defeated Gianmarco Ferrari 2-6 6-4 6-2 in the Naples CH qualifying round 1 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tammaro M.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Ferrari G.

Ferrari G.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Tammaro M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. Small sample — read as indicative. About

Statistics

This season
Tammaro M.Ferrari G.
1st serve in·Even
66%
67%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
40%
59%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
44%
50%
Service points won·Clear edge
42%
56%
Return points won·Clear edge
21%
34%
Break points saved·Even
58%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.0
1.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
0.0
1.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (1 vs 5). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tammaro M.
3.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 364 days (−1.5)
Ferrari G.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.0
Surface form
6.0
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 6
Fatigue & Travel
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q2
Paul J.
Sperle J.
5-77-626-2
Dalla Valle E.[12]
Jorda Sanchis D.[4]
6-36-3
Bondioli F.[9]
Guerrieri A.[6]
6-27-66
Forti F.
Carboni L.
4-66-36-4
Barton H.[2]
Rottoli L.
6-16-3
Ribecai M.[5]
Tammaro M.
6-06-1
Q1
Carboni L.
Piros Z.[1]
6-43-67-64
Forti F.
Chepelev A.[7]
4-66-26-3
Barton H.[2]
Mcdonald N.
6-46-2
Rottoli L.
Potenza L.[8]
5-76-46-4
Sperle J.
Arnaboldi F.[3]
6-46-726-2
Ribecai M.[5]
Raquillet L.
6-16-4
Tammaro M.
Ferrari G.[11]
2-66-46-2
Bondioli F.[9]
Ciocca G.
6-26-0
Paul J.
Lokoli L.[10]
6-26-2
Jorda Sanchis D.[4]
Catini N.
6-12-0
Dalla Valle E.[12]
Osti F.
6-26-2
Guerrieri A.[6]
Bilardo J.
6-36-1