Jaime Faria vs Emilio Nava — Sao Paulo CH Quarter-final

Sao Paulo CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
POR5
Jaime Faria
#98ATP
1735ELO
1706Clay ELO
$531kYTD
$1.4MCAREER
22 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 March 2026
clay
Emilio Nava
USA1
Emilio Nava
#86ATP
1704ELO
1686Clay ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
Faria J.
7-6 6-1
Nava E.
Faria J.
7762
Nava E.
6310

Jaime Faria defeated Emilio Nava 7-6 6-1 in the Sao Paulo CH quarter-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Emilio Nava came in ranked #86.

Key context

  • Match story: Jaime Faria came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Faria J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Nava E.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Faria J.

Serve advantage — Faria J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Faria J.Nava E.
—
Serve
23
—
Return
3

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Faria J.Nava E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
68%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.8
7.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.5
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (41 vs 38). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Faria J.Nava E.
Clutch Rating·Even
54
52
Break points saved·Clear edge
76
94
Break points won·Slight edge
22
17
Deciding sets·Slight edge
81
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
76
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Faria J.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Nava E.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.7+20 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.3Clay Elo 1686
4.7Overall Elo 1735
ELO gap
5.3Overall Elo 1704
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
5.8
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
4.8
Minutes 14d
7.9
0.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Faria J.Nava E.
Freshness·Slight edge
86
95

Faria J.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Nava E.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Burruchaga R.[3]
Faria J.[5]
6-756-46-4
Semi-finals
Faria J.[5]
Dellien H.[6]
6-46-1
Burruchaga R.[3]
Prado Angelo J.[8]
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Burruchaga R.[3]
Barrena A.[7]
6-13-1
Dellien H.[6]
Barrios Vera T.[4]
6-47-64
Faria J.[5]
Nava E.[1]
7-636-1
Prado Angelo J.[8]
Bueno G.
4-66-26-2
R16
Barrios Vera T.[4]
Monteiro T.
6-6
Nava E.[1]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-20-0
Barrena A.[7]
Varillas J.
2-66-26-3
Burruchaga R.[3]
Ribeiro E.
1-66-46-4
Prado Angelo J.[8]
Guillen Meza A.
4-66-17-64
Dellien H.[6]
Diaz Acosta F.
6-42-66-3
Bueno G.
Torres J.
6-16-3
Faria J.[5]
Meligeni Alves F.
6-23-66-2
R32
Ribeiro E.
Cadenasso G.
5-2
Nava E.[1]
Tosetto R.
6-46-777-5
Meligeni Alves F.
Braga V.
6-16-0
Faria J.[5]
Goncalves Ceolin J.
6-26-2
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Arias B.
6-32-66-3
Barrios Vera T.[4]
Pereira J.
6-36-3
Monteiro T.
Sakamoto P.
6-44-66-4
Dellien H.[6]
Reis Da Silva J.
4-66-26-3
Barrena A.[7]
Ribeiro Marcondes I.
6-41-67-61
Varillas J.
Miguel L.
7-56-0
Burruchaga R.[3]
Heide G.
1-67-656-4
Prado Angelo J.[8]
Dutra Da Silva D.
3-66-36-2
Guillen Meza A.
Midon L.
6-37-65
Diaz Acosta F.
Schiessl J.
6-16-2
Torres J.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-41-67-61
Bueno G.
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-16-2