Matej Dodig vs Christian Langmo — Split CH Round of 32

Split CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
CRO1
Matej Dodig
#254ATP
1461ELO
1430Clay ELO
20 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 23 March 2026
clay
Christian Langmo
USA
Christian Langmo
#467ATP
1267ELO
1141Clay ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWLWLLW
Dodig M.
3-6 7-5 6-2
Langmo C.
Dodig M.
3762
Langmo C.
6521

Matej Dodig defeated Christian Langmo 3-6 7-5 6-2 in the Split CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Dodig M.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Langmo C.

Langmo C.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Dodig M.

Serve advantage — Langmo C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Dodig M.Langmo C.
1st serve in·Even
65%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Clear edge
57%
70%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.7
6.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.3
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (20 vs 29). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Dodig M.Langmo C.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
31
23
Break points saved·Clear edge
76
88
Break points won·Even
3
1
Deciding sets·Clear edge
40
22
Tiebreaks·Dominant
65
39

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Dodig M.
7.8
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Langmo C.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.1+289 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.9Clay Elo 1141
7.8Overall Elo 1461
ELO gap
2.2Overall Elo 1267
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.4
Surface form
6.2
Fatigue & Travel
4.7
Minutes 14d
2.6
0.0
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Dodig M.Langmo C.
Freshness·Dominant
47
86

Dodig M.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 128 games (7d) · Langmo C.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 22 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Poljicak M.
Gentzsch T.[7]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Gentzsch T.[7]
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
7-56-4
Poljicak M.
Coppejans K.[6]
3-66-46-4
Quarter-finals
Poljicak M.
Dodig M.[1]
4-1
Coppejans K.[6]
Neumayer L.[3]
6-46-3
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Nedic A.
6-17-5
Gentzsch T.[7]
Vasilev A.
6-06-2
R16
Poljicak M.
Gill F.[8]
6-16-2
Neumayer L.[3]
Ajdukovic D.
6-26-3
Coppejans K.[6]
Mrva M.
6-42-67-63
Gentzsch T.[7]
Romano F.
7-686-0
Vasilev A.
Coulibaly E.
6-36-2
Dodig M.[1]
Kopp S.
6-43-66-2
Nedic A.
Kuzmanov D.
7-6106-1
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Ferreira Silva F.[5]
2-66-36-4
R32
Ajdukovic D.
Campana Lee G.
7-616-1
Coppejans K.[6]
Krutykh O.
6-36-2
Ferreira Silva F.[5]
Michalski D.
6-46-2
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Berrettini J.
6-16-0
Coulibaly E.
Simundza J.
6-34-66-3
Nedic A.
Sels J.
6-16-4
Kuzmanov D.
Fatic N.[4]
6-36-1
Vasilev A.
Loffhagen G.[2]
7-56-4
Gentzsch T.[7]
Forejtek J.
7-56-1
Mrva M.
Rincon D.
6-46-4
Dodig M.[1]
Langmo C.
3-67-56-2
Kopp S.
Kirkin E.
6-46-1
Poljicak M.
Ivanisevic E.
6-24-66-2
Gill F.[8]
Krumich M.
6-37-5
Neumayer L.[3]
Martin Manzano J.
7-646-3
Romano F.
Oetzbach A.
6-37-64