Kimmer Coppejans vs Lukas Neumayer — Split CH Quarter-final

Split CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Kimmer Coppejans
BEL6
Kimmer Coppejans
#199ATP
1544ELO
1513Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 March 2026
clay
AUT3
Lukas Neumayer
#162ATP
1621ELO
1598Clay ELO
$133kYTD
$573kCAREER
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLLWW
Coppejans K.
6-4 6-3
Neumayer L.
Coppejans K.
662
Neumayer L.
430

Kimmer Coppejans defeated Lukas Neumayer 6-4 6-3 in the Split CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Coppejans K.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Neumayer L.

Neumayer L.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Coppejans K.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Coppejans K.Neumayer L.
1st serve in·Even
64%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
53%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Even
44%
41%
Break points saved·Even
63%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.6
2.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (33 vs 29). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Coppejans K.Neumayer L.
Clutch Rating·Even
44
40
Break points saved·Even
67
71
Break points won·Dominant
29
62
Deciding sets·Dominant
74
11
Tiebreaks·Dominant
43
85

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Coppejans K.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Neumayer L.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.5Clay Elo 1513
Surface ELO
5.5+85 Clay Elo edge
4.8Overall Elo 1544
ELO gap
5.2Overall Elo 1621
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.8
Surface form
5.5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
1.2
Minutes 14d
5.0
0.0
3-set count
0.0
8.0
Prev. match
4.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Coppejans K.Neumayer L.
Freshness·Clear edge
76
57

Coppejans K.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 73 games (7d) · Neumayer L.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 123 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Poljicak M.
Gentzsch T.[7]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Gentzsch T.[7]
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
7-56-4
Poljicak M.
Coppejans K.[6]
3-66-46-4
Quarter-finals
Poljicak M.
Dodig M.[1]
4-1
Coppejans K.[6]
Neumayer L.[3]
6-46-3
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Nedic A.
6-17-5
Gentzsch T.[7]
Vasilev A.
6-06-2
R16
Poljicak M.
Gill F.[8]
6-16-2
Neumayer L.[3]
Ajdukovic D.
6-26-3
Coppejans K.[6]
Mrva M.
6-42-67-63
Gentzsch T.[7]
Romano F.
7-686-0
Vasilev A.
Coulibaly E.
6-36-2
Dodig M.[1]
Kopp S.
6-43-66-2
Nedic A.
Kuzmanov D.
7-6106-1
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Ferreira Silva F.[5]
2-66-36-4
R32
Ajdukovic D.
Campana Lee G.
7-616-1
Coppejans K.[6]
Krutykh O.
6-36-2
Ferreira Silva F.[5]
Michalski D.
6-46-2
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Berrettini J.
6-16-0
Coulibaly E.
Simundza J.
6-34-66-3
Nedic A.
Sels J.
6-16-4
Kuzmanov D.
Fatic N.[4]
6-36-1
Vasilev A.
Loffhagen G.[2]
7-56-4
Gentzsch T.[7]
Forejtek J.
7-56-1
Mrva M.
Rincon D.
6-46-4
Dodig M.[1]
Langmo C.
3-67-56-2
Kopp S.
Kirkin E.
6-46-1
Poljicak M.
Ivanisevic E.
6-24-66-2
Gill F.[8]
Krumich M.
6-37-5
Neumayer L.[3]
Martin Manzano J.
7-646-3
Romano F.
Oetzbach A.
6-37-64