Vitaliy Sachko vs Federico Cina — Naples CH Quarter-final

Naples CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Vitaliy Sachko
UKR
Vitaliy Sachko
#198ATP
1584ELO
1550Clay ELO
$158kYTD
$835kCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWWLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 23 March 2026
clay
ITA
Federico Cina
#174ATP
1630ELO
1590Clay ELO
$293kYTD
$533kCAREER
19 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLWLWWWL
Sachko V.
6-2 4-6 6-1
Cina F.
Sachko V.
6462
Cina F.
2611

Vitaliy Sachko defeated Federico Cina 6-2 4-6 6-1 in the Naples CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Vitaliy Sachko came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–2 4–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sachko V.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Cina F.

Cina F.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Sachko V.

Serve advantage — Cina F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sachko V.Cina F.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
59%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
67%
Aces / match·Even
3.7
3.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (20 vs 22). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sachko V.Cina F.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
51
42
Break points saved·Slight edge
81
87
Break points won·Clear edge
48
32
Deciding sets·Clear edge
76
52
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
19
28

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sachko V.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Cina F.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.7Clay Elo 1550
Surface ELO
4.3+40 Clay Elo edge
5.2Overall Elo 1584
ELO gap
4.8Overall Elo 1630
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.2
Surface form
6.1
0.0Lost last 8
Win streak
10.010-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Sachko V.Cina F.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
86

Sachko V.: 19 days rest · Cina F.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 31 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Medjedovic H.[5]
Altmaier D.[1]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Altmaier D.[1]
Bondioli F.
6-22-66-1
Medjedovic H.[5]
Sachko V.
7-56-1
Quarter-finals
Sachko V.
Cina F.
6-24-66-1
Altmaier D.[1]
Dalla Valle E.
6-16-3
Bondioli F.
Ribecai M.
6-36-2
Medjedovic H.[5]
Muller A.[3]
6-26-2
R16
Ribecai M.
Martineau M.
2-66-46-2
Muller A.[3]
Caniato C.
4-67-656-4
Cina F.
Forti F.
6-36-3
Altmaier D.[1]
Guerrieri A.
6-44-66-3
Bondioli F.
Nagal S.
6-24-67-5
Medjedovic H.[5]
Sakellaridis S.
6-43-67-5
Sachko V.
Pellegrino A.[6]
4-66-36-4
Dalla Valle E.
Giustino L.
4-66-46-1
R32
Guerrieri A.
Travaglia S.
7-672-67-67
Martineau M.
Wawrinka S.[4]
2-66-47-62
Ribecai M.
Purtseladze S.
6-26-3
Altmaier D.[1]
Damas M.
6-36-1
Giustino L.
Jacquet K.[7]
2-66-46-0
Sachko V.
Blancaneaux G.
6-26-1
Dalla Valle E.
Kukushkin M.
6-13-67-5
Medjedovic H.[5]
Barton H.
6-34-67-62
Sakellaridis S.
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-11-67-5
Pellegrino A.[6]
Jianu F.
6-16-4
Cina F.
Piraino G.
6-46-2
Forti F.
Kopriva V.[2]
6-36-4
Nagal S.
Squire H.
7-53-66-4
Bondioli F.
Blanchet U.[8]
7-656-4
Caniato C.
Vasami J.
6-36-2
Muller A.[3]
Paul J.
7-56-4