Hamad Medjedovic vs Hynek Barton — Naples CH Round of 32

Naples CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Hamad Medjedovic
SRB5
Hamad Medjedovic
#68ATP
1841ELO
1816Clay ELO
$736kYTD
$3.0MCAREER
22 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 23 March 2026
clay
CZE
Hynek Barton
#256ATP
1570ELO
1535Clay ELO
22 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWLWW
Medjedovic H.
6-3 4-6 7-6
Barton H.
Medjedovic H.
64772
Barton H.
36621

Hamad Medjedovic defeated Hynek Barton 6-3 4-6 7-6 in the Naples CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Hamad Medjedovic came in ranked #68.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Medjedovic H.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Barton H.

Barton H.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Medjedovic H.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Medjedovic H.Barton H.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
65%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
64%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.0
5.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (22 vs 37). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Medjedovic H.Barton H.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
74
38
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
79
Break points won·Dominant
39
6
Deciding sets·Clear edge
90
71
Tiebreaks·Dominant
91
28

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Medjedovic H.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Barton H.
3.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
9.9+281 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.1Clay Elo 1535
9.5Overall Elo 1841
ELO gap
0.5Overall Elo 1570
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
6.2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Medjedovic H.Barton H.
Freshness·Even
95
94

Medjedovic H.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Barton H.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Medjedovic H.[5]
Altmaier D.[1]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Altmaier D.[1]
Bondioli F.
6-22-66-1
Medjedovic H.[5]
Sachko V.
7-56-1
Quarter-finals
Sachko V.
Cina F.
6-24-66-1
Altmaier D.[1]
Dalla Valle E.
6-16-3
Bondioli F.
Ribecai M.
6-36-2
Medjedovic H.[5]
Muller A.[3]
6-26-2
R16
Ribecai M.
Martineau M.
2-66-46-2
Muller A.[3]
Caniato C.
4-67-656-4
Cina F.
Forti F.
6-36-3
Altmaier D.[1]
Guerrieri A.
6-44-66-3
Bondioli F.
Nagal S.
6-24-67-5
Medjedovic H.[5]
Sakellaridis S.
6-43-67-5
Sachko V.
Pellegrino A.[6]
4-66-36-4
Dalla Valle E.
Giustino L.
4-66-46-1
R32
Guerrieri A.
Travaglia S.
7-672-67-67
Martineau M.
Wawrinka S.[4]
2-66-47-62
Ribecai M.
Purtseladze S.
6-26-3
Altmaier D.[1]
Damas M.
6-36-1
Giustino L.
Jacquet K.[7]
2-66-46-0
Sachko V.
Blancaneaux G.
6-26-1
Dalla Valle E.
Kukushkin M.
6-13-67-5
Medjedovic H.[5]
Barton H.
6-34-67-62
Sakellaridis S.
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-11-67-5
Pellegrino A.[6]
Jianu F.
6-16-4
Cina F.
Piraino G.
6-46-2
Forti F.
Kopriva V.[2]
6-36-4
Nagal S.
Squire H.
7-53-66-4
Bondioli F.
Blanchet U.[8]
7-656-4
Caniato C.
Vasami J.
6-36-2
Muller A.[3]
Paul J.
7-56-4