Michael Mmoh vs Tyler Zink — Cuernavaca CH Semi-final

Cuernavaca CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Michael Mmoh
USA
Michael Mmoh
#192ATP
1613ELO
1599Hard ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 March 2026
hard
USA
Tyler Zink
#330ATP
1371ELO
1351Hard ELO
25 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWWLW
Mmoh M.
1-6 7-6 6-2
Zink T.
Mmoh M.
17762
Zink T.
66421

Michael Mmoh defeated Tyler Zink 1-6 7-6 6-2 in the Cuernavaca CH semi-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mmoh M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Zink T.

Zink T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mmoh M.Zink T.
1st serve in·Even
63%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
72%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
44%
54%
Service points won·Even
63%
65%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
64%
66%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.8
5.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.6
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (32 vs 28). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mmoh M.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Zink T.
3.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
8.0+249 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.0Hard Elo 1351
7.8Overall Elo 1613
ELO gap
2.2Overall Elo 1371
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
3.4
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mmoh M.Zink T.
Freshness·Slight edge
93
82

Mmoh M.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Zink T.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 59 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Mmoh M.
Daniel T.
4-66-46-3
Semi-finals
Daniel T.
Martin A.[8]
6-726-36-4
Mmoh M.
Zink T.
1-67-646-2
Quarter-finals
Daniel T.
Mena F.
6-36-4
Mmoh M.
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-776-26-2
Zink T.
Huesler M.[5]
6-46-3
Martin A.[8]
Ayeni O.
7-56-3
R16
Mena F.
Martin D.
6-47-5
Mmoh M.
Kozlov S.[7]
7-56-2
Zink T.
Tobon M.
7-654-66-3
Pacheco Mendez R.
Shah A.
6-10-0
Daniel T.
Andrade A.[6]
3-66-36-2
Ayeni O.
Crawford O.[3]
6-44-66-3
Martin A.[8]
Hayen A.
5-76-26-3
Huesler M.[5]
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-36-2
R32
Shah A.
Alujas R.
6-21-66-3
Huesler M.[5]
Yuzuki T.
4-66-36-4
Hernandez Serrano J.
Colson T.
6-46-0
Martin D.
Gomez F.[1]
3-67-627-63
Ayeni O.
Smith K.
2-66-36-3
Mmoh M.
Rubio Fierros A.
7-56-1
Zink T.
Polmans M.
6-37-5
Hayen A.
Catry R.
6-37-64
Martin A.[8]
Ursu V.
6-36-747-67
Kozlov S.[7]
Magadan A.
6-46-4
Pacheco Mendez R.
Galarneau A.[4]
6-36-0
Tobon M.
Ficovich J.[2]
6-22-67-65
Mena F.
Zhukayev B.
6-46-2
Daniel T.
Delaney J.
6-46-2
Andrade A.[6]
Mayo A.
6-47-64
Crawford O.[3]
Wiskandt M.
6-46-1