Jesper De Jong vs Pablo Llamas Ruiz — Murcia CH Quarter-final

Murcia CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Jesper De Jong
NED1
Jesper De Jong
#73ATP
1711ELO
1696Clay ELO
$612kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 March 2026
clay
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
ESP
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
#119ATP
1757ELO
1732Clay ELO
$268kYTD
$884kCAREER
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWWW
De Jong J.
6-3 6-2
Llamas Ruiz P.
De Jong J.
662
Llamas Ruiz P.
320

Jesper De Jong defeated Pablo Llamas Ruiz 6-3 6-2 in the Murcia CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Jesper De Jong came in ranked #73, leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's final. Jesper De Jong extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-05-27Roland GarrosQ1clayJesper De Jong7-5 7-6(6)

Serve vs return

This season
De Jong J.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Llamas Ruiz P.

Llamas Ruiz P.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs De Jong J.

Serve advantage — Llamas Ruiz P.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

De Jong J.Llamas Ruiz P.
49
Serve
—
32
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
De Jong J.Llamas Ruiz P.
1st serve in·Clear edge
58%
72%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
42%
Break points saved·Even
57%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.4
2.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.2
1.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (21 vs 33). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
De Jong J.Llamas Ruiz P.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
56
63
Break points saved·Even
90
88
Break points won·Even
37
39
Deciding sets·Slight edge
69
79
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
57
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
De Jong J.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Llamas Ruiz P.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
4.4Clay Elo 1696
Surface ELO
5.6+37 Clay Elo edge
4.3Overall Elo 1711
ELO gap
5.7Overall Elo 1757
10.0
H2H
0.0
7.0
Surface form
7.1
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
De Jong J.Llamas Ruiz P.
Freshness·Slight edge
90
97

De Jong J.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Llamas Ruiz P.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Carreno Busta P.[3]
Carballes Baena R.[8]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Carballes Baena R.[8]
De Jong J.[1]
2-66-46-4
Carreno Busta P.[3]
Coppejans K.
6-26-3
Quarter-finals
Carballes Baena R.[8]
Ofner S.[4]
7-642-66-1
Carreno Busta P.[3]
Pellegrino A.[7]
6-36-4
De Jong J.[1]
Llamas Ruiz P.
6-36-2
Coppejans K.
Bailly G.
6-03-66-3
R16
De Jong J.[1]
Houkes M.
6-16-3
Llamas Ruiz P.
Choinski J.[6]
6-26-746-3
Ofner S.[4]
Brancaccio R.
6-06-4
Pellegrino A.[7]
Engel J.
3-66-27-5
Bailly G.
Moro Canas A.
7-56-756-2
Carreno Busta P.[3]
Gill F.
4-66-36-2
Coppejans K.
Negritu C.
7-56-4
Carballes Baena R.[8]
Kukushkin M.
6-13-66-2
R32
Houkes M.
Wessels L.
6-26-2
De Jong J.[1]
Hassan B.
6-33-66-3
Ofner S.[4]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-27-64
Brancaccio R.
Sanchez Quilez A.
7-646-2
Kukushkin M.
Butvilas E.
7-646-4
Engel J.
Shelbayh A.
6-33-67-5
Coppejans K.
Moller E.[5]
6-46-1
Negritu C.
Gakhov I.
6-16-2
Carballes Baena R.[8]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-37-65
Pellegrino A.[7]
Martin Tiffon P.
6-46-4
Gill F.
Pieczonka F.
6-33-67-65
Carreno Busta P.[3]
Sanchez Jover C.
7-636-1
Bailly G.
Purtseladze S.
6-34-66-4
Moro Canas A.
Gaubas V.[2]
7-626-2
Choinski J.[6]
Damas M.
4-66-46-4
Llamas Ruiz P.
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-16-2