Nerman Fatic vs Tiago Pereira — Zadar CH Round of 32

Zadar CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#373ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 March 2026
clay
POR
Tiago Pereira
#337ATP
1179ELO
1200Clay ELO
22 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLLWL
Fatic N.
7-5 6-2
Pereira T.
Fatic N.
762
Pereira T.
520

Nerman Fatic defeated Tiago Pereira 7-5 6-2 in the Zadar CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Nerman Fatic closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fatic N.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Pereira T.

Pereira T.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Serve advantage — Fatic N.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fatic N.Pereira T.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
65%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
40%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
55%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
54%
46%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.8
2.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (15 vs 13). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fatic N.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Pereira T.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.9+278 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.1Clay Elo 1200
9.3Overall Elo 1496
ELO gap
0.7Overall Elo 1179
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
2.6
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 17
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.4
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Travaglia S.[4]
Gea A.[3]
2-1
Semi-finals
Gea A.[3]
Jacquet K.[2]
6-747-626-1
Travaglia S.[4]
Dodig M.[7]
7-636-3
Quarter-finals
Travaglia S.[4]
Molcan A.[5]
6-20-0
Gea A.[3]
Neumayer L.[8]
7-614-66-3
Jacquet K.[2]
Forejtek J.
7-636-2
Dodig M.[7]
Ajdukovic D.
6-36-3
R16
Dodig M.[7]
Krumich M.
3-66-47-64
Ajdukovic D.
Dalla Valle E.
6-47-5
Travaglia S.[4]
Squire H.
6-36-2
Gea A.[3]
Michalski D.
6-37-64
Forejtek J.
Nedic A.
6-36-4
Molcan A.[5]
Alcala Gurri M.
1-66-36-2
Neumayer L.[8]
Fatic N.
4-66-36-4
Jacquet K.[2]
Perez Contri S.
6-26-0
R32
Dodig M.[7]
Lokoli L.
2-66-27-60
Travaglia S.[4]
Poljicak M.
7-57-5
Squire H.
Palosi S.
6-45-3
Alcala Gurri M.
Cerny M.
6-26-2
Molcan A.[5]
Langmo C.
6-16-3
Neumayer L.[8]
Nagal S.
3-66-36-4
Forejtek J.
Giustino L.[6]
6-26-4
Nedic A.
Ivanisevic E.
7-56-2
Dalla Valle E.
Piros Z.[1]
6-17-64
Ajdukovic D.
Obradovic D.
6-06-4
Krumich M.
Sperle J.
7-56-4
Michalski D.
Pieri S.
6-36-0
Gea A.[3]
Kuzmanov D.
4-66-26-3
Perez Contri S.
Simundza J.
6-16-1
Jacquet K.[2]
Sels J.
6-04-66-0
Fatic N.
Pereira T.
7-56-2