Taro Daniel vs Facundo Mena — Cuernavaca CH Quarter-final

Cuernavaca CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Taro Daniel
JPN
Taro Daniel
#203ATP
1567ELO
1512Hard ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 March 2026
hard
Facundo Mena
ARG
Facundo Mena
#354ATP
1427ELO
1355Hard ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWLL
Daniel T.
6-3 6-4
Mena F.
Daniel T.
662
Mena F.
340

Taro Daniel defeated Facundo Mena 6-3 6-4 in the Cuernavaca CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Taro Daniel closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Daniel T.serving77% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Mena F.

Mena F.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Daniel T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Daniel T.Mena F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
74%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
55%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.9
7.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.1
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (25 vs 22). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Daniel T.Mena F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
42
9
Break points saved·Dominant
93
57
Break points won·Dominant
37
7
Deciding sets·Clear edge
16
28
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Daniel T.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Mena F.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.5+158 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.5Hard Elo 1355
5.8Overall Elo 1567
ELO gap
4.2Overall Elo 1427
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.7
Surface form
3.3
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
8.1
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Daniel T.Mena F.
Freshness·Slight edge
72
61

Daniel T.: 2 days rest · 3 matches, 61 games (7d) · Mena F.: 2 days rest · 3 matches, 88 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Mmoh M.
Daniel T.
4-66-46-3
Semi-finals
Daniel T.
Martin A.[8]
6-726-36-4
Mmoh M.
Zink T.
1-67-646-2
Quarter-finals
Daniel T.
Mena F.
6-36-4
Mmoh M.
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-776-26-2
Zink T.
Huesler M.[5]
6-46-3
Martin A.[8]
Ayeni O.
7-56-3
R16
Mena F.
Martin D.
6-47-5
Mmoh M.
Kozlov S.[7]
7-56-2
Zink T.
Tobon M.
7-654-66-3
Pacheco Mendez R.
Shah A.
6-10-0
Daniel T.
Andrade A.[6]
3-66-36-2
Ayeni O.
Crawford O.[3]
6-44-66-3
Martin A.[8]
Hayen A.
5-76-26-3
Huesler M.[5]
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-36-2
R32
Shah A.
Alujas R.
6-21-66-3
Huesler M.[5]
Yuzuki T.
4-66-36-4
Hernandez Serrano J.
Colson T.
6-46-0
Martin D.
Gomez F.[1]
3-67-627-63
Ayeni O.
Smith K.
2-66-36-3
Mmoh M.
Rubio Fierros A.
7-56-1
Zink T.
Polmans M.
6-37-5
Hayen A.
Catry R.
6-37-64
Martin A.[8]
Ursu V.
6-36-747-67
Kozlov S.[7]
Magadan A.
6-46-4
Pacheco Mendez R.
Galarneau A.[4]
6-36-0
Tobon M.
Ficovich J.[2]
6-22-67-65
Mena F.
Zhukayev B.
6-46-2
Daniel T.
Delaney J.
6-46-2
Andrade A.[6]
Mayo A.
6-47-64
Crawford O.[3]
Wiskandt M.
6-46-1