Elias Ymer vs Coleman Wong — Indian Wells Masters Qualifying Round 1

Indian Wells Masters · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
Elias Ymer
SWE
Elias Ymer
#188ATP
1548ELO
1527Hard ELO
$191kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Wednesday, 4 March 2026
hard
HKG
Coleman Wong
#108ATP
1602ELO
1593Hard ELO
$287kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWLLW
Ymer E.
6-3 3-6 7-6
Wong C.
Ymer E.
63772
Wong C.
36651

Elias Ymer defeated Coleman Wong 6-3 3-6 7-6 in the Indian Wells Masters qualifying round 1 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Coleman Wong came in ranked #108. Elias Ymer extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Elias Ymer closed it out in three sets, 6–3 3–6 7–6.

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-03-04Indian Wells MastersQ1hardElias Ymer6-3 3-6 7-6(5)
2026-01-19Australian OpenQ3hardElias Ymer7-6(4) 4-6 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Ymer E.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Wong C.

Wong C.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Ymer E.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Ymer E.Wong C.
—
Serve
37
—
Return
34

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ymer E.Wong C.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
65%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
61%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.8
10.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (21 vs 37). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ymer E.Wong C.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
48
42
Break points saved·Slight edge
83
91
Break points won·Clear edge
23
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
78
43
Tiebreaks·Dominant
35
88

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ymer E.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Wong C.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.6Hard Elo 1527
Surface ELO
6.4+66 Hard Elo edge
3.5Overall Elo 1548
ELO gap
6.5Overall Elo 1602
10.0
H2H
0.0
6.5
Surface form
6.2
Fatigue & Travel
6.7
Minutes 14d
7.5
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ymer E.Wong C.
Freshness·Even
100
100

Ymer E.: 18 days rest · Wong C.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw — qualifying

Q2
Svrcina D.
Kopriva V.
7-646-4
Mcdonald M.
Svajda T.
6-46-2
Hijikata R.
Buse I.
3-66-36-4
Maestrelli F.
Tirante T.
7-656-4
Prizmic D.
Vukic A.
6-26-4
Shimabukuro S.
Landaluce M.
6-26-737-5
Tseng C.
Burruchaga R.
2-67-636-3
Galarneau A.
Barrios Vera T.
6-36-4
Merida Aguilar D.
Sweeny D.
6-34-66-3
Bonzi B.
Mochizuki S.
6-45-76-3
Oconnell C.
Basilashvili N.
6-46-4
Schoolkate T.
Ymer E.
6-43-1
Q1
Kopriva V.
Sakamoto R.
6-47-66
Buse I.
Draxl L.
6-47-63
Hijikata R.
Riedi L.
7-56-3
Shimabukuro S.
Smith C.
7-657-5
Burruchaga R.
Echargui M.
7-644-67-65
Merida Aguilar D.
Kypson P.
3-66-37-64
Sweeny D.
Johnson A.
6-26-1
Bonzi B.
Pinnington Jones J.
6-36-4
Basilashvili N.
Mejia N.
0-66-26-4
Schoolkate T.
Bolt A.
3-67-646-4
Ymer E.
Wong C.
6-33-67-65
Svajda T.
Nardi L.
4-67-626-3
Mcdonald M.
Sachko V.
6-26-1
Svrcina D.
Krueger M.
7-666-4
Tirante T.
Ahmad I.
6-16-2
Maestrelli F.
Jarry N.
6-44-67-67
Vukic A.
Travaglia S.
7-627-62
Prizmic D.
Blanch D.
7-636-0
Landaluce M.
Blockx A.
6-06-2
Tseng C.
Goffin D.
6-46-1
Galarneau A.
Van Assche L.
7-666-4
Barrios Vera T.
Leach J.
6-36-3
Mochizuki S.
Gomez F.
6-44-66-3
Oconnell C.
Harris B.
6-46-3