Lulu Sun vs Maddison Inglis — Indian Wells Qualifying Round 1

Indian Wells · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
Lulu Sun
NZL
Lulu Sun
#112WTA
1637ELO
1654Hard ELO
25 yrs · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLWW
0 — 0
Sets
Wednesday, 4 March 2026
hard
Maddison Inglis
AUS
Maddison Inglis
#149WTA
1590ELO
1558Hard ELO
28 yrs · 171 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLL
Sun L.
7-5 6-3
Inglis M.
Sun L.
762
Inglis M.
53–

Lulu Sun defeated Maddison Inglis 7-5 6-3 in the Indian Wells qualifying round 1 on hard. The result followed the form book — Lulu Sun came in ranked #112.

Key context

  • Match story: Lulu Sun closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sun L.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Inglis M.

Inglis M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Sun L.

Serve advantage — Inglis M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Sun L.Inglis M.
59
Serve
—
0
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Sun L.Inglis M.
1st serve in·Even
57%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
46%
Service points won·Even
58%
58%
Return points won·Even
37%
41%
Break points saved·Even
57%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.5
3.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.6
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (14 vs 10). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sun L.Inglis M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
72
22
Break points saved·Dominant
94
50
Break points won·Dominant
52
25
Deciding sets·Dominant
90
36
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
78
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sun L.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Inglis M.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Injury return: 44 days (−1.0)
Form & Matchup
6.5+96 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.5Hard Elo 1558
6.2Overall Elo 1637
ELO gap
3.8Overall Elo 1590
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.8
Surface form
8.3
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Sun L.Inglis M.
Freshness·Even
100
100

Sun L.: 18 days rest · Inglis M.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw — qualifying

Q2
Rakhimova K.
Timofeeva M.
4-65-4
Jimenez Kasintseva V.
Boulter K.
2-67-56-2
Stakusic M.
Sawangkaew M.
6-16-2
Sakatsume H.
Bartunkova N.
7-51-66-3
Tararudee L.
Galfi D.
6-36-4
Zakharova A.
Fruhvirtova L.
6-47-62
Vidmanova D.
Hon P.
7-57-64
Townsend T.
Urhobo A.
6-07-65
Day K.
Semenistaja D.
6-26-1
Parry D.
Sun L.
6-26-3
Hunter S.
Jeanjean L.
6-26-2
Gibson T.
Kalieva E.
4-67-56-3
Q1
Jimenez Kasintseva V.
Stefanini L.
4-66-46-4
Boulter K.
Tomova V.
6-46-3
Stakusic M.
Golubic V.
7-686-2
Sawangkaew M.
Masarova R.
6-37-5
Sakatsume H.
Waltert S.
6-46-4
Bartunkova N.
Jones E.
6-26-2
Galfi D.
Yuan Y.
6-26-4
Tararudee L.
Pareja J.
6-46-3
Zakharova A.
Dolehide C.
7-56-1
Fruhvirtova L.
Lepchenko V.
6-36-3
Hon P.
Zarazua R.
7-57-63
Vidmanova D.
Trevisan M.
6-36-2
Rakhimova K.
Carle M.
6-26-2
Timofeeva M.
Lamens S.
6-26-2
Urhobo A.
Chirico L.
6-32-66-3
Townsend T.
Garland J.
6-46-4
Semenistaja D.
Osuigwe W.
2-66-16-3
Day K.
Sasnovich A.
6-27-5
Sun L.
Inglis M.
7-56-3
Parry D.
Mandlik E.
6-26-3
Hunter S.
Kraus S.
7-646-4
Jeanjean L.
Stoiana M.
6-46-4
Kalieva E.
Starodubtseva Y.
6-36-1
Gibson T.
Brengle M.
6-07-66