Talia Gibson vs Madison Brengle — Indian Wells Qualifying Round 1

Indian Wells · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
Talia Gibson
AUS
Talia Gibson
#58WTA
1737ELO
1764Hard ELO
22 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLLL
0 — 0
Sets
Wednesday, 4 March 2026
hard
Madison Brengle
USA
Madison Brengle
#223WTA
1575ELO
1539Hard ELO
36 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWWW
Gibson T.
6-0 7-6
Brengle M.
Gibson T.
6782
Brengle M.
066–

Talia Gibson defeated Madison Brengle 6-0 7-6 in the Indian Wells qualifying round 1 on hard. The result followed the form book — Talia Gibson came in ranked #58.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gibson T.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Brengle M.

Brengle M.serving48% hold

wins 49% of points on serve vs Gibson T.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Gibson T.Brengle M.
60
Serve
—
0
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Gibson T.Brengle M.
1st serve in·Clear edge
63%
78%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
71%
54%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
45%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
52%
Return points won·Slight edge
43%
50%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
49%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.1
0.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (32 vs 36). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gibson T.Brengle M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
74
7
Break points saved·Dominant
83
7
Break points won·Dominant
70
98
Deciding sets·Dominant
83
8
Tiebreaks·Dominant
90
46

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gibson T.
7.5
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Brengle M.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.1+225 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.9Hard Elo 1539
7.8Overall Elo 1737
ELO gap
2.2Overall Elo 1575
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.7
Surface form
3.9
Fatigue & Travel
3-set count
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gibson T.Brengle M.
Freshness·Clear edge
97
76

Gibson T.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Brengle M.: 2 days rest · 3 matches, 55 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw — qualifying

Q2
Rakhimova K.
Timofeeva M.
4-65-4
Jimenez Kasintseva V.
Boulter K.
2-67-56-2
Stakusic M.
Sawangkaew M.
6-16-2
Sakatsume H.
Bartunkova N.
7-51-66-3
Tararudee L.
Galfi D.
6-36-4
Zakharova A.
Fruhvirtova L.
6-47-62
Vidmanova D.
Hon P.
7-57-64
Townsend T.
Urhobo A.
6-07-65
Day K.
Semenistaja D.
6-26-1
Parry D.
Sun L.
6-26-3
Hunter S.
Jeanjean L.
6-26-2
Gibson T.
Kalieva E.
4-67-56-3
Q1
Jimenez Kasintseva V.
Stefanini L.
4-66-46-4
Boulter K.
Tomova V.
6-46-3
Stakusic M.
Golubic V.
7-686-2
Sawangkaew M.
Masarova R.
6-37-5
Sakatsume H.
Waltert S.
6-46-4
Bartunkova N.
Jones E.
6-26-2
Galfi D.
Yuan Y.
6-26-4
Tararudee L.
Pareja J.
6-46-3
Zakharova A.
Dolehide C.
7-56-1
Fruhvirtova L.
Lepchenko V.
6-36-3
Hon P.
Zarazua R.
7-57-63
Vidmanova D.
Trevisan M.
6-36-2
Rakhimova K.
Carle M.
6-26-2
Timofeeva M.
Lamens S.
6-26-2
Urhobo A.
Chirico L.
6-32-66-3
Townsend T.
Garland J.
6-46-4
Semenistaja D.
Osuigwe W.
2-66-16-3
Day K.
Sasnovich A.
6-27-5
Sun L.
Inglis M.
7-56-3
Parry D.
Mandlik E.
6-26-3
Hunter S.
Kraus S.
7-646-4
Jeanjean L.
Stoiana M.
6-46-4
Kalieva E.
Starodubtseva Y.
6-36-1
Gibson T.
Brengle M.
6-07-66