Sapfo Sakellaridi vs Natalija Senic — W35 Heraklion Round of 32

W35 Heraklion · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GRE
Sapfo Sakellaridi
#442WTA
1164ELO
1099Hard ELO
23 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLL
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 March 2026
hard
SRB
Natalija Senic
#350WTA
23 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWLW
Sakellaridi S.
6-3 6-2
Senic N.
Sakellaridi S.
662
Senic N.
32–

Sapfo Sakellaridi defeated Natalija Senic 6-3 6-2 in the W35 Heraklion round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Natalija Senic came in ranked #350, defending the title.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sakellaridi S.serving44% hold

wins 48% of points on serve vs Senic N.

Senic N.serving56% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Sakellaridi S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sakellaridi S.Senic N.
1st serve in·Clear edge
54%
69%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
59%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
47%
Service points won·Even
58%
55%
Return points won·Slight edge
43%
51%
Break points saved·Slight edge
54%
45%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.9
0.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
1.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (35 vs 26). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sakellaridi S.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Senic N.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.8
Surface form
9.2
Fatigue & Travel
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Mintegi Del Olmo A.
Astakhova D.
6-10-0
Semi-finals
Mintegi Del Olmo A.
Fita Boluda A.
6-36-4
Astakhova D.
Dencheva R.
6-726-16-0
Quarter-finals
Dencheva R.
Kovackova A.
6-14-67-63
Fita Boluda A.
Ruggeri J.
6-16-3
Mintegi Del Olmo A.
Bertea E.
6-26-0
Astakhova D.
Burillo Escorihuela I.
7-56-3
R16
Dencheva R.
Martinez Cirez C.
6-46-2
Bertea E.
Vargova N.
2-66-26-4
Kovackova A.
Rinaldo Persson K.
7-654-2
Fita Boluda A.
Sakellaridi S.
6-16-1
Burillo Escorihuela I.
Paterno G.
6-26-2
Mintegi Del Olmo A.
Janicijevic S.
6-26-1
Astakhova D.
Spiteri D.
6-36-747-5
Ruggeri J.
Pieri T.
4-66-46-4
R32
Dencheva R.
Hobgarski K.
6-00-66-3
Fita Boluda A.
Korokozidi E.
6-27-62
Bertea E.
Coleman E.
7-656-3
Rinaldo Persson K.
Paganetti V.
4-66-26-4
Spiteri D.
Kovackova J.
7-56-3
Astakhova D.
Spasova B.
6-16-2
Vargova N.
Sagmar I.
6-16-1
Ruggeri J.
Tsetsou E.
6-06-1
Martinez Cirez C.
Bertoldo J.
7-56-2
Janicijevic S.
Kolb N.
6-36-1
Kovackova A.
Kabbaj Y.
6-17-5
Paterno G.
Cragg K.
7-626-4
Sakellaridi S.
Senic N.
6-36-2
Mintegi Del Olmo A.
Pochtovyk K.
6-26-1
Pieri T.
Teixido Garcia M.
6-746-46-4
Burillo Escorihuela I.
Menguene M.
6-26-4