Marco Cecchinato vs Jerome Kym — Kigali 1 CH Quarter-final

Kigali 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Marco Cecchinato
ITA
Marco Cecchinato
#195ATP
1576ELO
1546Clay ELO
$149kYTD
$5.3MCAREER
33 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWWL
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 2 March 2026
clay
SUI5
Jerome Kym
#196ATP
1599ELO
1529Clay ELO
$89kYTD
$731kCAREER
23 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLWLLL
Cecchinato M.
6-7 3-3
Kym J.
Cecchinato M.
663–
Kym J.
783–

Marco Cecchinato advanced when Jerome Kym retired 6-7 3-3 in the Kigali 1 CH quarter-final.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cecchinato M.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Kym J.

Kym J.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Cecchinato M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cecchinato M.Kym J.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
55%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
67%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Even
64%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.3
7.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (32 vs 12). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cecchinato M.Kym J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
42
35
Break points saved·Even
89
91
Break points won·Even
20
21
Deciding sets·Clear edge
36
13
Tiebreaks·Even
79
83

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cecchinato M.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Kym J.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.5+17 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.5Clay Elo 1529
4.0Overall Elo 1576
ELO gap
6.0Overall Elo 1599
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
4.9
Surface form
4.6
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
5.6
3-set count
0.0
7.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
8.5
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Cecchinato M.Kym J.
Freshness·Slight edge
71
77

Cecchinato M.: 5 days rest · 3 matches, 68 games (7d) · Kym J.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 47 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Schwaerzler J.
Napolitano S.
7-657-66
Semi-finals
Napolitano S.
Gea A.[2]
7-635-76-3
Schwaerzler J.
Cecchinato M.
6-27-68
Quarter-finals
Schwaerzler J.
Trungelliti M.[1]
7-636-737-67
Napolitano S.
Pavlovic L.[8]
6-46-3
Gea A.[2]
Hemery C.
6-36-4
Cecchinato M.
Kym J.[5]
6-763-3
R16
Trungelliti M.[1]
Bax F.
6-36-4
Cecchinato M.
Kopp S.
6-786-47-64
Kym J.[5]
De Krom M.
6-46-2
Napolitano S.
Mikrut L.[3]
1-67-653-2
Hemery C.
Nijboer R.
6-46-4
Schwaerzler J.
Kolar Z.[7]
4-67-627-66
Pavlovic L.[8]
Coulibaly E.
6-26-4
Gea A.[2]
Jianu F.
7-626-4
R32
Schwaerzler J.
Erhard M.
7-657-61
Trungelliti M.[1]
Johns G.
6-44-66-4
Kopp S.
Carballes Baena R.[4]
6-36-2
Kym J.[5]
Pieri S.
6-736-46-4
Pavlovic L.[8]
Martin Tiffon P.
6-16-4
Napolitano S.
Denolly C.
6-36-4
Hemery C.
Clarke J.[6]
7-653-67-615
Nijboer R.
Houkes M.
6-36-3
Jianu F.
Martin A.
6-26-2
Bax F.
Pennaforti G.
6-36-4
Kolar Z.[7]
Cuenin S.
7-626-3
Cecchinato M.
Ouakaa A.
7-56-1
De Krom M.
Ionel N.
5-76-36-3
Coulibaly E.
Bouchelaghem C.
6-36-2
Gea A.[2]
Dalla Valle E.
6-37-64
Mikrut L.[3]
Forejtek J.
6-37-65