Zsombor Piros vs Henri Squire — Lugano CH Round of 32

Lugano CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Zsombor Piros
HUN3
Zsombor Piros
#169ATP
1661ELO
1629Hard ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 February 2026
hard
GER
Henri Squire
#235ATP
1511ELO
1459Hard ELO
25 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLLW
Piros Z.
7-5 7-6
Squire H.
Piros Z.
7772
Squire H.
5650

Zsombor Piros defeated Henri Squire 7-5 7-6 in the Lugano CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Piros Z.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Squire H.

Squire H.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Piros Z.Squire H.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
70%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
46%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
69%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.9
4.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.4
4.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (28 vs 31). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Piros Z.Squire H.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
55
42
Break points saved·Even
84
87
Break points won·Clear edge
32
12
Deciding sets·Clear edge
85
68
Tiebreaks·Even
36
33

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Piros Z.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Squire H.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.5+170 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.5Hard Elo 1459
7.7Overall Elo 1661
ELO gap
2.3Overall Elo 1511
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
5.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
1.4
3-set count
0.0
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Piros Z.Squire H.
Freshness·Slight edge
53
61

Piros Z.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 112 games (7d) · Squire H.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 77 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Piros Z.[3]
Schwaerzler J.
7-54-66-3
Semi-finals
Piros Z.[3]
Brunold M.
7-56-3
Schwaerzler J.
Dodig M.
7-646-4
Quarter-finals
Brunold M.
Huesler M.
6-46-4
Piros Z.[3]
Mrva M.
6-46-2
Dodig M.
Budkov Kjaer N.[1]
7-647-5
Schwaerzler J.
Stricker D.
6-46-3
R16
Schwaerzler J.
Brunclik P.
7-623-67-64
Stricker D.
Moro Canas A.
6-46-2
Mrva M.
Mmoh M.
1-66-46-4
Brunold M.
Holmgren A.[8]
7-57-63
Huesler M.
Glinka D.[2]
7-656-4
Piros Z.[3]
Gakhov I.
7-616-3
Dodig M.
Skatov T.[7]
6-34-66-4
Budkov Kjaer N.[1]
Nesterov P.
7-56-1
R32
Budkov Kjaer N.[1]
Bernet H.
6-16-4
Nesterov P.
Cassone M.
7-634-66-4
Dodig M.
Forejtek J.
6-26-4
Skatov T.[7]
Gentzsch T.
6-37-5
Brunclik P.
Sachko V.[4]
7-656-2
Schwaerzler J.
Basic M.
6-36-3
Stricker D.
Grenier H.[6]
6-46-3
Mrva M.
Rybakov A.
6-42-67-5
Mmoh M.
Bertola R.
6-46-726-4
Piros Z.[3]
Squire H.
7-57-65
Holmgren A.[8]
Uchida K.
7-6105-76-2
Brunold M.
Knaff A.
7-56-726-3
Glinka D.[2]
Dietrich D.
6-36-4
Huesler M.
Topo M.
2-66-40-0
Moro Canas A.
Fatic N.
2-66-37-63
Gakhov I.
Piraino G.
2-66-27-66