Camila Osorio vs Janice Tjen — Merida Round of 32

Merida · WTA · Round of 32
Camila Osorio
COL
Camila Osorio
#68WTA
1807ELO
1780Hard ELO
24 yrs · 162 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 February 2026
hard
INA6
Janice Tjen
#42WTA
1658ELO
1684Hard ELO
$630kYTD
$984kCAREER
24 yrs · 171 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLWL
Osorio C.
6-4 6-3
Tjen J.
Osorio C.
662
Tjen J.
430

Camila Osorio defeated Janice Tjen 6-4 6-3 in the Merida round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Camila Osorio came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Camila Osorio extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Camila Osorio closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-05-20RabatR16clayCamila Osorio3-6 6-3 0-6

Serve vs return

This season
Osorio C.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Tjen J.

Tjen J.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Osorio C.

Serve advantage — Osorio C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Osorio C.Tjen J.
10
Serve
53
62
Return
13

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Osorio C.Tjen J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
46%
Service points won·Even
57%
57%
Return points won·Slight edge
47%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
48%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.7
3.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.3
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (27 vs 16). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Osorio C.Tjen J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
84
78
Break points saved·Slight edge
73
84
Break points won·Clear edge
99
85
Deciding sets·Clear edge
96
75
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
84
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Osorio C.
7.5
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Tjen J.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.5+96 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.5Hard Elo 1684
5.6Overall Elo 1807
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1658
5.0
H2H
5.0
9.0
Surface form
5.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.5
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Osorio C.Tjen J.
Freshness·Even
93
93

Osorio C.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Tjen J.: 10 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
23°CMainly clear
Wind 22 km/hHumidity 49%

Draw

Final
Bucsa C.
Frech M.
6-14-66-4
Semi-finals
Frech M.
Zhang S.
6-26-766-3
Bucsa C.
Paolini J.[1]
7-56-4
Quarter-finals
Paolini J.[1]
Boulter K.
0-66-36-3
Zhang S.
Jimenez Kasintseva V.
6-16-3
Frech M.
Bouzkova M.[4]
6-34-66-3
Bucsa C.
Sonmez Z.
6-36-4
R16
Bouzkova M.[4]
Arango E.
2-66-12-0
Frech M.
Bouzas Maneiro J.[7]
6-06-3
Bucsa C.
Stakusic M.
7-616-3
Boulter K.
Osorio C.
6-30-0
Zhang S.
Navarro E.[2]
6-46-4
Sonmez Z.
Li A.[3]
3-67-676-4
Paolini J.[1]
Hon P.
6-06-2
Jimenez Kasintseva V.
Linette M.[8]
5-77-657-5
R32
Bucsa C.
Vekic D.
6-36-2
Boulter K.
Haddad Maia B.
6-46-4
Jimenez Kasintseva V.
Putintseva Y.
6-41-66-4
Zhang S.
Lepchenko V.
6-26-1
Stakusic M.
Yastremska D.[5]
6-46-3
Linette M.[8]
Maria T.
7-636-3
Hon P.
Zarazua R.
6-22-66-4
Bouzas Maneiro J.[7]
Watson H.
6-36-1
Osorio C.
Tjen J.[6]
6-46-3
Arango E.
Potapova A.
7-606-2
Frech M.
Timofeeva M.
6-47-66
Sonmez Z.
Brace C.
6-26-0