Zsombor Piros vs Ivan Gakhov — Lugano CH Round of 16

Lugano CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Zsombor Piros
HUN3
Zsombor Piros
#169ATP
1661ELO
1629Hard ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 February 2026
hard
Ivan Gakhov
RUS
Ivan Gakhov
#387ATP
1430ELO
1387Hard ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLWL
Piros Z.
7-6 6-3
Gakhov I.
Piros Z.
7762
Gakhov I.
6130

Zsombor Piros defeated Ivan Gakhov 7-6 6-3 in the Lugano CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Zsombor Piros closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Piros Z.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Gakhov I.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Serve advantage — Piros Z.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Piros Z.Gakhov I.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
46%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Clear edge
69%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.7
6.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.4
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (28 vs 16). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Piros Z.Gakhov I.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
55
34
Break points saved·Even
84
82
Break points won·Clear edge
32
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
85
59
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
36
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Piros Z.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Gakhov I.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.3+243 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.7Hard Elo 1387
8.4Overall Elo 1661
ELO gap
1.6Overall Elo 1430
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
8.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
6.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Piros Z.Gakhov I.
Freshness·
53
—

Piros Z.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 112 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Piros Z.[3]
Schwaerzler J.
7-54-66-3
Semi-finals
Piros Z.[3]
Brunold M.
7-56-3
Schwaerzler J.
Dodig M.
7-646-4
Quarter-finals
Brunold M.
Huesler M.
6-46-4
Piros Z.[3]
Mrva M.
6-46-2
Dodig M.
Budkov Kjaer N.[1]
7-647-5
Schwaerzler J.
Stricker D.
6-46-3
R16
Schwaerzler J.
Brunclik P.
7-623-67-64
Stricker D.
Moro Canas A.
6-46-2
Mrva M.
Mmoh M.
1-66-46-4
Brunold M.
Holmgren A.[8]
7-57-63
Huesler M.
Glinka D.[2]
7-656-4
Piros Z.[3]
Gakhov I.
7-616-3
Dodig M.
Skatov T.[7]
6-34-66-4
Budkov Kjaer N.[1]
Nesterov P.
7-56-1
R32
Budkov Kjaer N.[1]
Bernet H.
6-16-4
Nesterov P.
Cassone M.
7-634-66-4
Dodig M.
Forejtek J.
6-26-4
Skatov T.[7]
Gentzsch T.
6-37-5
Brunclik P.
Sachko V.[4]
7-656-2
Schwaerzler J.
Basic M.
6-36-3
Stricker D.
Grenier H.[6]
6-46-3
Mrva M.
Rybakov A.
6-42-67-5
Mmoh M.
Bertola R.
6-46-726-4
Piros Z.[3]
Squire H.
7-57-65
Holmgren A.[8]
Uchida K.
7-6105-76-2
Brunold M.
Knaff A.
7-56-726-3
Glinka D.[2]
Dietrich D.
6-36-4
Huesler M.
Topo M.
2-66-40-0
Moro Canas A.
Fatic N.
2-66-37-63
Gakhov I.
Piraino G.
2-66-27-66