Ivan Gakhov vs Gabriele Piraino — Lugano CH Round of 32

Lugano CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Ivan Gakhov
RUS
Ivan Gakhov
#387ATP
1430ELO
1387Hard ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 23 February 2026
hard
ITA
Gabriele Piraino
#371ATP
1254ELO
1202Hard ELO
22 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
Gakhov I.
2-6 6-2 7-6
Piraino G.
Gakhov I.
26782
Piraino G.
62661

Ivan Gakhov defeated Gabriele Piraino 2-6 6-2 7-6 in the Lugano CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gakhov I.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Piraino G.

Piraino G.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gakhov I.Piraino G.
1st serve in·Even
60%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
64%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
55%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.1
3.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.8
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (16 vs 15). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gakhov I.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Piraino G.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.0+185 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.0Hard Elo 1202
6.6Overall Elo 1430
ELO gap
3.4Overall Elo 1254
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.1
Surface form
6.2
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.9
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gakhov I.Piraino G.
Freshness·
—
100

Piraino G.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Piros Z.[3]
Schwaerzler J.
7-54-66-3
Semi-finals
Piros Z.[3]
Brunold M.
7-56-3
Schwaerzler J.
Dodig M.
7-646-4
Quarter-finals
Brunold M.
Huesler M.
6-46-4
Piros Z.[3]
Mrva M.
6-46-2
Dodig M.
Budkov Kjaer N.[1]
7-647-5
Schwaerzler J.
Stricker D.
6-46-3
R16
Schwaerzler J.
Brunclik P.
7-623-67-64
Stricker D.
Moro Canas A.
6-46-2
Mrva M.
Mmoh M.
1-66-46-4
Brunold M.
Holmgren A.[8]
7-57-63
Huesler M.
Glinka D.[2]
7-656-4
Piros Z.[3]
Gakhov I.
7-616-3
Dodig M.
Skatov T.[7]
6-34-66-4
Budkov Kjaer N.[1]
Nesterov P.
7-56-1
R32
Budkov Kjaer N.[1]
Bernet H.
6-16-4
Nesterov P.
Cassone M.
7-634-66-4
Dodig M.
Forejtek J.
6-26-4
Skatov T.[7]
Gentzsch T.
6-37-5
Brunclik P.
Sachko V.[4]
7-656-2
Schwaerzler J.
Basic M.
6-36-3
Stricker D.
Grenier H.[6]
6-46-3
Mrva M.
Rybakov A.
6-42-67-5
Mmoh M.
Bertola R.
6-46-726-4
Piros Z.[3]
Squire H.
7-57-65
Holmgren A.[8]
Uchida K.
7-6105-76-2
Brunold M.
Knaff A.
7-56-726-3
Glinka D.[2]
Dietrich D.
6-36-4
Huesler M.
Topo M.
2-66-40-0
Moro Canas A.
Fatic N.
2-66-37-63
Gakhov I.
Piraino G.
2-66-27-66