Matej Dodig vs Timofey Skatov — Lugano CH Round of 16

Lugano CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
CRO
Matej Dodig
#208ATP
1461ELO
1407Hard ELO
20 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWLWLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 23 February 2026
hard
Timofey Skatov
KAZ7
Timofey Skatov
#172ATP
1544ELO
1479Hard ELO
$107kYTD
$1.1MCAREER
25 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWLLLWW
Dodig M.
6-3 4-6 6-4
Skatov T.
Dodig M.
6462
Skatov T.
3641

Matej Dodig defeated Timofey Skatov 6-3 4-6 6-4 in the Lugano CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Matej Dodig closed it out in three sets, 6–3 4–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Dodig M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Skatov T.

Skatov T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Dodig M.

Serve advantage — Skatov T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Dodig M.Skatov T.
1st serve in·Even
65%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
56%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.4
2.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.3
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (20 vs 37). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Dodig M.Skatov T.
Clutch Rating·Even
33
31
Break points saved·Slight edge
76
81
Break points won·Clear edge
3
27
Deciding sets·Clear edge
47
31
Tiebreaks·Dominant
65
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Dodig M.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Skatov T.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.4Hard Elo 1407
Surface ELO
5.6+73 Hard Elo edge
4.5Overall Elo 1461
ELO gap
5.5Overall Elo 1544
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.3
Surface form
3.8
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.2
Minutes 14d
6.4
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Dodig M.Skatov T.
Freshness·Dominant
56
82

Dodig M.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 98 games (7d) · Skatov T.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 39 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Piros Z.[3]
Schwaerzler J.
7-54-66-3
Semi-finals
Piros Z.[3]
Brunold M.
7-56-3
Schwaerzler J.
Dodig M.
7-646-4
Quarter-finals
Brunold M.
Huesler M.
6-46-4
Piros Z.[3]
Mrva M.
6-46-2
Dodig M.
Budkov Kjaer N.[1]
7-647-5
Schwaerzler J.
Stricker D.
6-46-3
R16
Schwaerzler J.
Brunclik P.
7-623-67-64
Stricker D.
Moro Canas A.
6-46-2
Mrva M.
Mmoh M.
1-66-46-4
Brunold M.
Holmgren A.[8]
7-57-63
Huesler M.
Glinka D.[2]
7-656-4
Piros Z.[3]
Gakhov I.
7-616-3
Dodig M.
Skatov T.[7]
6-34-66-4
Budkov Kjaer N.[1]
Nesterov P.
7-56-1
R32
Budkov Kjaer N.[1]
Bernet H.
6-16-4
Nesterov P.
Cassone M.
7-634-66-4
Dodig M.
Forejtek J.
6-26-4
Skatov T.[7]
Gentzsch T.
6-37-5
Brunclik P.
Sachko V.[4]
7-656-2
Schwaerzler J.
Basic M.
6-36-3
Stricker D.
Grenier H.[6]
6-46-3
Mrva M.
Rybakov A.
6-42-67-5
Mmoh M.
Bertola R.
6-46-726-4
Piros Z.[3]
Squire H.
7-57-65
Holmgren A.[8]
Uchida K.
7-6105-76-2
Brunold M.
Knaff A.
7-56-726-3
Glinka D.[2]
Dietrich D.
6-36-4
Huesler M.
Topo M.
2-66-40-0
Moro Canas A.
Fatic N.
2-66-37-63
Gakhov I.
Piraino G.
2-66-27-66