Zsombor Piros vs Mika Brunold — Lugano CH Semi-final

Lugano CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Zsombor Piros
HUN3
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1629Hard ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 February 2026
hard
SUI
Mika Brunold
#414ATP
1466ELO
1443Hard ELO
21 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWLWW
Piros Z.
7-5 6-3
Brunold M.
Piros Z.
762
Brunold M.
530

Zsombor Piros defeated Mika Brunold 7-5 6-3 in the Lugano CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Zsombor Piros came in ranked #120.

Key context

  • Match story: Zsombor Piros closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Piros Z.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Brunold M.

Brunold M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Piros Z.Brunold M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
64%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
58%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Clear edge
69%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.0
2.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (28 vs 15). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Piros Z.Brunold M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
57
24
Break points saved·Clear edge
84
72
Break points won·Clear edge
32
15
Deciding sets·Dominant
85
3
Tiebreaks·Dominant
48
92

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Piros Z.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Brunold M.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.5+186 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.5Hard Elo 1443
7.9Overall Elo 1661
ELO gap
2.1Overall Elo 1466
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
6.0
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Piros Z.Brunold M.
Freshness·
48
—

Piros Z.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Piros Z.[3]
Schwaerzler J.
7-54-66-3
Semi-finals
Piros Z.[3]
Brunold M.
7-56-3
Schwaerzler J.
Dodig M.
7-646-4
Quarter-finals
Brunold M.
Huesler M.
6-46-4
Piros Z.[3]
Mrva M.
6-46-2
Dodig M.
Budkov Kjaer N.[1]
7-647-5
Schwaerzler J.
Stricker D.
6-46-3
R16
Schwaerzler J.
Brunclik P.
7-623-67-64
Stricker D.
Moro Canas A.
6-46-2
Mrva M.
Mmoh M.
1-66-46-4
Brunold M.
Holmgren A.[8]
7-57-63
Huesler M.
Glinka D.[2]
7-656-4
Piros Z.[3]
Gakhov I.
7-616-3
Dodig M.
Skatov T.[7]
6-34-66-4
Budkov Kjaer N.[1]
Nesterov P.
7-56-1
R32
Budkov Kjaer N.[1]
Bernet H.
6-16-4
Nesterov P.
Cassone M.
7-634-66-4
Dodig M.
Forejtek J.
6-26-4
Skatov T.[7]
Gentzsch T.
6-37-5
Brunclik P.
Sachko V.[4]
7-656-2
Schwaerzler J.
Basic M.
6-36-3
Stricker D.
Grenier H.[6]
6-46-3
Mrva M.
Rybakov A.
6-42-67-5
Mmoh M.
Bertola R.
6-46-726-4
Piros Z.[3]
Squire H.
7-57-65
Holmgren A.[8]
Uchida K.
7-6105-76-2
Brunold M.
Knaff A.
7-56-726-3
Glinka D.[2]
Dietrich D.
6-36-4
Huesler M.
Topo M.
2-66-40-0
Moro Canas A.
Fatic N.
2-66-37-63
Gakhov I.
Piraino G.
2-66-27-66