Mika Brunold vs Marc Andrea Huesler — Lugano CH Quarter-final

Lugano CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
SUI
Mika Brunold
#408ATP
1466ELO
1443Hard ELO
21 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 February 2026
hard
Marc Andrea Huesler
SUI
Marc Andrea Huesler
#311ATP
1504ELO
1489Hard ELO
30 yrs · 196 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLWLLWWL
Brunold M.
6-4 6-4
Huesler M.
Brunold M.
662
Huesler M.
440

Mika Brunold defeated Marc Andrea Huesler 6-4 6-4 in the Lugano CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Mika Brunold edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Brunold M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Huesler M.

Huesler M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Brunold M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Brunold M.Huesler M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
60%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
63%
75%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
57%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
66%
Return points won·Even
39%
35%
Break points saved·Clear edge
54%
67%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.1
8.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.9
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (15 vs 21). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Brunold M.Huesler M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
24
29
Break points saved·Clear edge
72
95
Break points won·Slight edge
15
7
Deciding sets·Slight edge
3
12
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
92
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Brunold M.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Huesler M.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.4Hard Elo 1443
Surface ELO
5.6+46 Hard Elo edge
4.5Overall Elo 1466
ELO gap
5.5Overall Elo 1504
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
4.2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.5
3-set count
0.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Brunold M.Huesler M.
Freshness·
—
100

Huesler M.: 21 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Piros Z.[3]
Schwaerzler J.
7-54-66-3
Semi-finals
Piros Z.[3]
Brunold M.
7-56-3
Schwaerzler J.
Dodig M.
7-646-4
Quarter-finals
Brunold M.
Huesler M.
6-46-4
Piros Z.[3]
Mrva M.
6-46-2
Dodig M.
Budkov Kjaer N.[1]
7-647-5
Schwaerzler J.
Stricker D.
6-46-3
R16
Schwaerzler J.
Brunclik P.
7-623-67-64
Stricker D.
Moro Canas A.
6-46-2
Mrva M.
Mmoh M.
1-66-46-4
Brunold M.
Holmgren A.[8]
7-57-63
Huesler M.
Glinka D.[2]
7-656-4
Piros Z.[3]
Gakhov I.
7-616-3
Dodig M.
Skatov T.[7]
6-34-66-4
Budkov Kjaer N.[1]
Nesterov P.
7-56-1
R32
Budkov Kjaer N.[1]
Bernet H.
6-16-4
Nesterov P.
Cassone M.
7-634-66-4
Dodig M.
Forejtek J.
6-26-4
Skatov T.[7]
Gentzsch T.
6-37-5
Brunclik P.
Sachko V.[4]
7-656-2
Schwaerzler J.
Basic M.
6-36-3
Stricker D.
Grenier H.[6]
6-46-3
Mrva M.
Rybakov A.
6-42-67-5
Mmoh M.
Bertola R.
6-46-726-4
Piros Z.[3]
Squire H.
7-57-65
Holmgren A.[8]
Uchida K.
7-6105-76-2
Brunold M.
Knaff A.
7-56-726-3
Glinka D.[2]
Dietrich D.
6-36-4
Huesler M.
Topo M.
2-66-40-0
Moro Canas A.
Fatic N.
2-66-37-63
Gakhov I.
Piraino G.
2-66-27-66