Amit Vales vs Bautista De La Pena — Metepec CH Qualifying Round 1

Metepec CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
ISR7
Amit Vales
#725ATP
21 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 February 2026
hard
BRA
Bautista De La Pena
#1535ATP
17 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWL
Vales A.
6-2 6-3
De La Pena B.
Vales A.
662
De La Pena B.
230

Amit Vales defeated Bautista De La Pena 6-2 6-3 in the Metepec CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Vales A.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs De La Pena B.

De La Pena B.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Vales A.

Serve advantage — Vales A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Vales A.De La Pena B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
55%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
56%
2nd serve points won·Clear edge
48%
35%
Service points won·Clear edge
59%
46%
Return points won·Slight edge
38%
30%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.2
0.3
Double faults / match·Even
3.8
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (5 vs 3). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Vales A.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
De La Pena B.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.4
Surface form
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Vales A.De La Pena B.
Freshness·
68
—

Vales A.: 2 days rest · 4 matches, 82 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Q2
Jones B.[5]
Ogura K.[9]
6-16-3
Dalmasso G.[6]
George B.[12]
6-42-67-5
Kingsley C.[1]
Schachter N.[8]
6-16-1
Nefve A.[11]
Sheehy J.[2]
3-66-26-4
Ayeni O.[3]
Vales A.[7]
6-46-2
Rodrigues N.
Osorio J.[10]
6-46-2
Q1
Kingsley C.[1]
Van Orderlain D.
6-06-3
Vales A.[7]
De La Pena B.
6-26-3
Rodrigues N.
Covato M.[4]
7-626-3
Schachter N.[8]
Perez B.
7-56-3
Nefve A.[11]
Bianchi J.
7-53-66-2
Ayeni O.[3]
Betancourt Gonzalez P.
6-37-5
Osorio J.[10]
Rico Arias N.
6-24-66-1
Ogura K.[9]
Kobelt A.
7-56-2
Dalmasso G.[6]
Beckles D.
6-36-1
George B.[12]
Kumar P.
4-66-26-4