Sumit Nagal vs David Jorda Sanchis — New Delhi CH Round of 32

New Delhi CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Sumit Nagal
IND
Sumit Nagal
#219ATP
1543ELO
1476Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 February 2026
hard
David Jorda Sanchis
ESP
David Jorda Sanchis
#184ATP
1545ELO
1334Hard ELO
$64kYTD
$240kCAREER
32 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWLWL
Nagal S.
6-3 7-5
Jorda Sanchis D.
Nagal S.
672
Jorda Sanchis D.
350

Sumit Nagal defeated David Jorda Sanchis 6-3 7-5 in the New Delhi CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Sumit Nagal closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Jorda Sanchis D.

Jorda Sanchis D.serving77% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Jorda Sanchis D.
1st serve in·Clear edge
71%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
61%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.0
4.6
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (24 vs 32). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Jorda Sanchis D.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
33
38
Break points saved·Slight edge
69
79
Break points won·Clear edge
35
23
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
69
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
5

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nagal S.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Jorda Sanchis D.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.7+141 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.3Hard Elo 1334
6.8Overall Elo 1543
ELO gap
3.2Overall Elo 1545
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.9
Surface form
2.2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
7.4
0.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Jorda Sanchis D.
Freshness·Even
95
93

Nagal S.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d) · Jorda Sanchis D.: 10 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Sakellaridis S.
Crawford O.[5]
7-54-67-66
Semi-finals
Sakellaridis S.
Gill F.
6-17-65
Crawford O.[5]
Sakamoto R.[2]
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Sakamoto R.[2]
Cina F.[6]
6-776-36-2
Crawford O.[5]
Clarke J.[3]
3-67-56-3
Gill F.
Geerts M.
4-66-36-4
Sakellaridis S.
Noguchi R.[8]
6-06-3
R16
Sakellaridis S.
Zhukayev B.
4-66-16-4
Noguchi R.[8]
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-3
Geerts M.
Michalski D.[7]
7-686-4
Clarke J.[3]
Binda A.
6-46-4
Sakamoto R.[2]
Gray A.
1-66-16-4
Gill F.
Bar Biryukov P.
6-37-63
Crawford O.[5]
Ivashka I.
6-16-4
Cina F.[6]
Nagal S.
6-46-4
R32
Zhukayev B.
Sweeny D.[1]
6-766-26-2
Sakellaridis S.
Sureshkumar M.
6-47-5
Kuzmanov D.
Sekulic P.
6-47-5
Noguchi R.[8]
Dhamne M.
7-56-4
Crawford O.[5]
Ajdukovic D.
7-637-5
Ivashka I.
Sin S.
6-36-3
Binda A.
Yevseyev D.
6-776-16-2
Clarke J.[3]
Kasnikowski M.
7-646-4
Gray A.
Chung H.
6-07-66
Sakamoto R.[2]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-26-2
Bar Biryukov P.
Singh D.
6-36-4
Geerts M.
Butvilas E.
6-37-5
Cina F.[6]
Xilas I.
6-26-4
Nagal S.
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-37-5
Michalski D.[7]
Singh K.
4-67-656-3
Gill F.
Gomez F.[4]
6-43-67-62