Martin Landaluce vs Filip Misolic — Lille CH Round of 32

Lille CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Martin Landaluce
ESP
Martin Landaluce
1727ELO
1685Hard ELO
$742kYTD
$1.5MCAREER
20 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWL
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 16 February 2026
hard
Filip Misolic
AUT1
Filip Misolic
#221ATP
1587ELO
1469Hard ELO
$111kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLLLL
Landaluce M.
6-1 1-1
Misolic F.
Landaluce M.
61–
Misolic F.
11–

Martin Landaluce advanced when Filip Misolic retired 6-1 1-1 in the Lille CH round of 32.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Landaluce M.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Misolic F.

Misolic F.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Landaluce M.

Serve advantage — Landaluce M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Landaluce M.Misolic F.
1st serve in·Even
64%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
67%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
44%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
58%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
63%
63%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.3
3.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.6
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (30 vs 5). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Landaluce M.Misolic F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
59
79
Break points saved·Even
92
91
Break points won·Dominant
17
53
Deciding sets·Slight edge
89
94
Tiebreaks·Dominant
58
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Landaluce M.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Misolic F.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.5+216 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.5Hard Elo 1469
6.4Overall Elo 1727
ELO gap
3.6Overall Elo 1587
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.2
Surface form
1.8
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
6.2
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Landaluce M.Misolic F.
Freshness·
96
—

Landaluce M.: 10 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Van Assche L.[7]
Blockx A.[4]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Blockx A.[4]
Kym J.
6-37-64
Van Assche L.[7]
Kouame M.
6-16-1
Quarter-finals
Kouame M.
Basavareddy N.
6-36-3
Kym J.
Droguet T.[6]
6-45-76-2
Blockx A.[4]
Bonzi B.[8]
6-36-4
Van Assche L.[7]
Chidekh C.
6-26-3
R16
Kym J.
Landaluce M.
6-46-3
Bonzi B.[8]
Engel J.
6-26-2
Kouame M.
Schwaerzler J.
6-36-4
Basavareddy N.
Gaston H.[3]
6-46-1
Chidekh C.
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
7-657-64
Droguet T.[6]
Skatov T.
7-666-2
Blockx A.[4]
Bouquier A.
6-17-63
Van Assche L.[7]
Kukushkin M.
6-36-2
R32
Landaluce M.
Misolic F.[1]
6-11-1
Kouame M.
Dodig M.
6-46-2
Droguet T.[6]
Sachko V.
6-04-66-3
Blockx A.[4]
Safiullin R.
6-26-2
Bonzi B.[8]
Glinka D.
6-46-4
Schwaerzler J.
Goffin D.[5]
4-66-36-4
Chidekh C.
Fearnley J.[2]
6-32-66-2
Kym J.
Harris L.
5-77-666-4
Gaston H.[3]
Ofner S.
6-23-66-4
Van Assche L.[7]
Riedi L.
3-67-626-4
Kukushkin M.
Zeppieri G.
6-36-1
Basavareddy N.
Blanchet U.
6-26-2
Skatov T.
Hemery C.
6-16-3
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Holmgren A.
6-37-5
Bouquier A.
Coppejans K.
7-50-67-5
Engel J.
Massard L.
7-656-3