Jerome Kym vs Martin Landaluce — Lille CH Round of 16

Lille CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
SUI
Jerome Kym
#196ATP
1599ELO
1591Hard ELO
$89kYTD
$731kCAREER
23 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 February 2026
hard
Martin Landaluce
ESP
Martin Landaluce
1727ELO
1685Hard ELO
$742kYTD
$1.5MCAREER
20 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWL
Kym J.
6-4 6-3
Landaluce M.
Kym J.
662
Landaluce M.
430

Jerome Kym defeated Martin Landaluce 6-4 6-3 in the Lille CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Jerome Kym closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kym J.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Landaluce M.

Landaluce M.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Kym J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kym J.Landaluce M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
63%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.3
4.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.8
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (12 vs 30). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kym J.Landaluce M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
35
59
Break points saved·Even
91
92
Break points won·Even
21
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
13
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
83
58

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kym J.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Landaluce M.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.2Hard Elo 1591
Surface ELO
5.8+94 Hard Elo edge
4.2Overall Elo 1599
ELO gap
5.8Overall Elo 1727
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.0
Surface form
3.2
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
6.2
3-set count
0.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kym J.Landaluce M.
Freshness·Dominant
70
96

Kym J.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 47 games (7d) · Landaluce M.: 10 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Van Assche L.[7]
Blockx A.[4]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Blockx A.[4]
Kym J.
6-37-64
Van Assche L.[7]
Kouame M.
6-16-1
Quarter-finals
Kouame M.
Basavareddy N.
6-36-3
Kym J.
Droguet T.[6]
6-45-76-2
Blockx A.[4]
Bonzi B.[8]
6-36-4
Van Assche L.[7]
Chidekh C.
6-26-3
R16
Kym J.
Landaluce M.
6-46-3
Bonzi B.[8]
Engel J.
6-26-2
Kouame M.
Schwaerzler J.
6-36-4
Basavareddy N.
Gaston H.[3]
6-46-1
Chidekh C.
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
7-657-64
Droguet T.[6]
Skatov T.
7-666-2
Blockx A.[4]
Bouquier A.
6-17-63
Van Assche L.[7]
Kukushkin M.
6-36-2
R32
Landaluce M.
Misolic F.[1]
6-11-1
Kouame M.
Dodig M.
6-46-2
Droguet T.[6]
Sachko V.
6-04-66-3
Blockx A.[4]
Safiullin R.
6-26-2
Bonzi B.[8]
Glinka D.
6-46-4
Schwaerzler J.
Goffin D.[5]
4-66-36-4
Chidekh C.
Fearnley J.[2]
6-32-66-2
Kym J.
Harris L.
5-77-666-4
Gaston H.[3]
Ofner S.
6-23-66-4
Van Assche L.[7]
Riedi L.
3-67-626-4
Kukushkin M.
Zeppieri G.
6-36-1
Basavareddy N.
Blanchet U.
6-26-2
Skatov T.
Hemery C.
6-16-3
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Holmgren A.
6-37-5
Bouquier A.
Coppejans K.
7-50-67-5
Engel J.
Massard L.
7-656-3