Borna Gojo vs Facundo Mena — Metepec CH Round of 32

Metepec CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Borna Gojo
CRO5
Borna Gojo
#175ATP
1683ELO
1662Hard ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 February 2026
hard
Facundo Mena
ARG
Facundo Mena
#354ATP
1427ELO
1355Hard ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWLL
Gojo B.
6-7 6-4 7-6
Mena F.
Gojo B.
676772
Mena F.
794651

Borna Gojo defeated Facundo Mena 6-7 6-4 7-6 in the Metepec CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Borna Gojo came in ranked #175, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Borna Gojo extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-05-23Roland GarrosQ2clayBorna Gojo6-3 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Gojo B.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Mena F.

Mena F.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Serve advantage — Gojo B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gojo B.Mena F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
69%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.4
6.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (25 vs 22). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gojo B.Mena F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
9
Break points saved·Dominant
95
57
Break points won·Even
10
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
28
Tiebreaks·Dominant
73
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gojo B.
7.8
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Mena F.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.8+308 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.2Hard Elo 1355
8.1Overall Elo 1683
ELO gap
1.9Overall Elo 1427
5.0
H2H
5.0
8.2
Surface form
5.4
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Minutes 14d
7.8
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gojo B.Mena F.
Freshness·Dominant
100
55

Gojo B.: 17 days rest · Mena F.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 88 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Gojo B.[5]
Galarneau A.[4]
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Galarneau A.[4]
Andrade A.[6]
5-77-56-4
Gojo B.[5]
Pacheco Mendez R.[3]
7-656-4
Quarter-finals
Gojo B.[5]
Tomic B.[2]
6-34-66-4
Andrade A.[6]
Ficovich J.[1]
1-67-57-64
Galarneau A.[4]
Winter E.
5-77-57-5
Pacheco Mendez R.[3]
Kozlov S.[8]
6-46-2
R16
Ficovich J.[1]
Nefve A.
6-36-3
Andrade A.[6]
Rodrigues N.
6-46-4
Galarneau A.[4]
Kingsley C.
6-43-66-3
Winter E.
Martin A.[7]
6-23-66-3
Pacheco Mendez R.[3]
Ayeni O.
3-66-16-4
Gojo B.[5]
Jones B.
6-34-2
Kozlov S.[8]
Poling K.
6-47-64
Tomic B.[2]
Brouwer G.
4-66-36-2
R32
Kozlov S.[8]
Mccormick T.
6-36-746-4
Ficovich J.[1]
Fishback R.
6-46-4
Nefve A.
Sau Franco A.
7-636-4
Andrade A.[6]
Gomez J.
6-26-3
Winter E.
Dickerson R.
6-27-5
Martin A.[7]
Aguilar J.
6-26-3
Pacheco Mendez R.[3]
Dalmasso G.
6-26-1
Gojo B.[5]
Mena F.
6-776-47-65
Jones B.
De Alba R.
6-17-69
Tomic B.[2]
Rubio Fierros A.
7-666-3
Rodrigues N.
Tobon M.
6-24-3
Ayeni O.
Martin D.
7-50-0
Galarneau A.[4]
Hardt N.
6-36-0
Kingsley C.
Baadi T.
6-36-0
Poling K.
Bicknell B.
4-67-56-1
Brouwer G.
Gima S.
6-26-3