Michael Geerts vs Daniel Michalski — New Delhi CH Round of 16

New Delhi CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Michael Geerts
BEL
Michael Geerts
#328ATP
1400ELO
1383Hard ELO
31 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 February 2026
hard
Daniel Michalski
POL7
Daniel Michalski
#299ATP
1435ELO
1426Hard ELO
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLLL
Geerts M.
7-6 6-4
Michalski D.
Geerts M.
71062
Michalski D.
6840

Michael Geerts defeated Daniel Michalski 7-6 6-4 in the New Delhi CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Geerts M.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Michalski D.

Michalski D.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Geerts M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Geerts M.Michalski D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
40%
Break points saved·Clear edge
64%
52%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.2
2.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.4
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (18 vs 23). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Geerts M.Michalski D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
9
26
Break points saved·Dominant
82
24
Break points won·Clear edge
3
26
Deciding sets·Dominant
8
64
Tiebreaks·Dominant
2
62

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Geerts M.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Michalski D.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.7Hard Elo 1383
Surface ELO
5.3+43 Hard Elo edge
5.1Overall Elo 1400
ELO gap
4.9Overall Elo 1435
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.2
Surface form
7.3
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Geerts M.Michalski D.
Freshness·Clear edge
89
73

Geerts M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d) · Michalski D.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 67 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Sakellaridis S.
Crawford O.[5]
7-54-67-66
Semi-finals
Sakellaridis S.
Gill F.
6-17-65
Crawford O.[5]
Sakamoto R.[2]
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Sakamoto R.[2]
Cina F.[6]
6-776-36-2
Crawford O.[5]
Clarke J.[3]
3-67-56-3
Gill F.
Geerts M.
4-66-36-4
Sakellaridis S.
Noguchi R.[8]
6-06-3
R16
Sakellaridis S.
Zhukayev B.
4-66-16-4
Noguchi R.[8]
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-3
Geerts M.
Michalski D.[7]
7-686-4
Clarke J.[3]
Binda A.
6-46-4
Sakamoto R.[2]
Gray A.
1-66-16-4
Gill F.
Bar Biryukov P.
6-37-63
Crawford O.[5]
Ivashka I.
6-16-4
Cina F.[6]
Nagal S.
6-46-4
R32
Zhukayev B.
Sweeny D.[1]
6-766-26-2
Sakellaridis S.
Sureshkumar M.
6-47-5
Kuzmanov D.
Sekulic P.
6-47-5
Noguchi R.[8]
Dhamne M.
7-56-4
Crawford O.[5]
Ajdukovic D.
7-637-5
Ivashka I.
Sin S.
6-36-3
Binda A.
Yevseyev D.
6-776-16-2
Clarke J.[3]
Kasnikowski M.
7-646-4
Gray A.
Chung H.
6-07-66
Sakamoto R.[2]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-26-2
Bar Biryukov P.
Singh D.
6-36-4
Geerts M.
Butvilas E.
6-37-5
Cina F.[6]
Xilas I.
6-26-4
Nagal S.
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-37-5
Michalski D.[7]
Singh K.
4-67-656-3
Gill F.
Gomez F.[4]
6-43-67-62