Titouan Droguet vs Vitaliy Sachko — Lille CH Round of 32

Lille CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Titouan Droguet
FRA6
Titouan Droguet
#116ATP
1717ELO
1650Hard ELO
$273kYTD
$1.1MCAREER
25 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWLLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 February 2026
hard
Vitaliy Sachko
UKR
Vitaliy Sachko
#198ATP
1584ELO
1475Hard ELO
$158kYTD
$835kCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWWLWWL
Droguet T.
6-0 4-6 6-3
Sachko V.
Droguet T.
6462
Sachko V.
0631

Titouan Droguet defeated Vitaliy Sachko 6-0 4-6 6-3 in the Lille CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Titouan Droguet came in ranked #116.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Droguet T.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Sachko V.

Sachko V.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Droguet T.

Serve advantage — Droguet T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Droguet T.Sachko V.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
66%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
56%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
59%
Return points won·Even
36%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.2
3.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.6
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (31 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Droguet T.Sachko V.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
64
51
Break points saved·Slight edge
88
81
Break points won·Dominant
17
48
Deciding sets·Clear edge
93
76
Tiebreaks·Dominant
87
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Droguet T.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Sachko V.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.5+175 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.5Hard Elo 1475
7.3Overall Elo 1717
ELO gap
2.7Overall Elo 1584
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.2
Surface form
3.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
3.4
Minutes 14d
9.1
0.0
3-set count
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Droguet T.Sachko V.
Freshness·Dominant
69
100

Droguet T.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 61 games (7d) · Sachko V.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Van Assche L.[7]
Blockx A.[4]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Blockx A.[4]
Kym J.
6-37-64
Van Assche L.[7]
Kouame M.
6-16-1
Quarter-finals
Kouame M.
Basavareddy N.
6-36-3
Kym J.
Droguet T.[6]
6-45-76-2
Blockx A.[4]
Bonzi B.[8]
6-36-4
Van Assche L.[7]
Chidekh C.
6-26-3
R16
Kym J.
Landaluce M.
6-46-3
Bonzi B.[8]
Engel J.
6-26-2
Kouame M.
Schwaerzler J.
6-36-4
Basavareddy N.
Gaston H.[3]
6-46-1
Chidekh C.
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
7-657-64
Droguet T.[6]
Skatov T.
7-666-2
Blockx A.[4]
Bouquier A.
6-17-63
Van Assche L.[7]
Kukushkin M.
6-36-2
R32
Landaluce M.
Misolic F.[1]
6-11-1
Kouame M.
Dodig M.
6-46-2
Droguet T.[6]
Sachko V.
6-04-66-3
Blockx A.[4]
Safiullin R.
6-26-2
Bonzi B.[8]
Glinka D.
6-46-4
Schwaerzler J.
Goffin D.[5]
4-66-36-4
Chidekh C.
Fearnley J.[2]
6-32-66-2
Kym J.
Harris L.
5-77-666-4
Gaston H.[3]
Ofner S.
6-23-66-4
Van Assche L.[7]
Riedi L.
3-67-626-4
Kukushkin M.
Zeppieri G.
6-36-1
Basavareddy N.
Blanchet U.
6-26-2
Skatov T.
Hemery C.
6-16-3
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Holmgren A.
6-37-5
Bouquier A.
Coppejans K.
7-50-67-5
Engel J.
Massard L.
7-656-3