Federico Cina vs Sumit Nagal — New Delhi CH Round of 16

New Delhi CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ITA6
Federico Cina
#174ATP
1630ELO
1583Hard ELO
$293kYTD
$533kCAREER
19 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 February 2026
hard
Sumit Nagal
IND
Sumit Nagal
#219ATP
1543ELO
1476Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
Cina F.
6-4 6-4
Nagal S.
Cina F.
662
Nagal S.
440

Federico Cina defeated Sumit Nagal 6-4 6-4 in the New Delhi CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Federico Cina edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cina F.serving77% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Nagal S.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Cina F.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cina F.Nagal S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
71%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
65%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.3
1.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (22 vs 24). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cina F.Nagal S.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
42
33
Break points saved·Clear edge
87
69
Break points won·Even
32
35
Deciding sets·Dominant
52
16
Tiebreaks·Dominant
28
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cina F.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Nagal S.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.0+107 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.0Hard Elo 1476
5.4Overall Elo 1630
ELO gap
4.6Overall Elo 1543
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.6
Surface form
3.9
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.6
3-set count
0.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Cina F.Nagal S.
Freshness·Slight edge
86
92

Cina F.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 31 games (7d) · Nagal S.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Sakellaridis S.
Crawford O.[5]
7-54-67-66
Semi-finals
Sakellaridis S.
Gill F.
6-17-65
Crawford O.[5]
Sakamoto R.[2]
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Sakamoto R.[2]
Cina F.[6]
6-776-36-2
Crawford O.[5]
Clarke J.[3]
3-67-56-3
Gill F.
Geerts M.
4-66-36-4
Sakellaridis S.
Noguchi R.[8]
6-06-3
R16
Sakellaridis S.
Zhukayev B.
4-66-16-4
Noguchi R.[8]
Kuzmanov D.
6-46-3
Geerts M.
Michalski D.[7]
7-686-4
Clarke J.[3]
Binda A.
6-46-4
Sakamoto R.[2]
Gray A.
1-66-16-4
Gill F.
Bar Biryukov P.
6-37-63
Crawford O.[5]
Ivashka I.
6-16-4
Cina F.[6]
Nagal S.
6-46-4
R32
Zhukayev B.
Sweeny D.[1]
6-766-26-2
Sakellaridis S.
Sureshkumar M.
6-47-5
Kuzmanov D.
Sekulic P.
6-47-5
Noguchi R.[8]
Dhamne M.
7-56-4
Crawford O.[5]
Ajdukovic D.
7-637-5
Ivashka I.
Sin S.
6-36-3
Binda A.
Yevseyev D.
6-776-16-2
Clarke J.[3]
Kasnikowski M.
7-646-4
Gray A.
Chung H.
6-07-66
Sakamoto R.[2]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-26-2
Bar Biryukov P.
Singh D.
6-36-4
Geerts M.
Butvilas E.
6-37-5
Cina F.[6]
Xilas I.
6-26-4
Nagal S.
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-37-5
Michalski D.[7]
Singh K.
4-67-656-3
Gill F.
Gomez F.[4]
6-43-67-62