Gijs Brouwer vs Sebastian Gima — Metepec CH Round of 32

Metepec CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Gijs Brouwer
NED
Gijs Brouwer
#1115ATP
30 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 February 2026
hard
ROU
Sebastian Gima
#516ATP
1179ELO
1143Hard ELO
24 yrs · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWLWL
Brouwer G.
6-2 6-3
Gima S.
Brouwer G.
662
Gima S.
230

Gijs Brouwer defeated Sebastian Gima 6-2 6-3 in the Metepec CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Brouwer G.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Gima S.

Gima S.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Brouwer G.

Serve advantage — Gima S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Brouwer G.Gima S.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
62%
67%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
55%
Service points won·Slight edge
56%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
50%
51%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.5
3.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.8
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (4 vs 7). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Brouwer G.
3.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 231 days (−1.5)
Gima S.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.3
Surface form
2.3
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
7.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Brouwer G.Gima S.
Freshness·Slight edge
100
95

Brouwer G.: 19 days rest · Gima S.: 11 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Gojo B.[5]
Galarneau A.[4]
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Galarneau A.[4]
Andrade A.[6]
5-77-56-4
Gojo B.[5]
Pacheco Mendez R.[3]
7-656-4
Quarter-finals
Gojo B.[5]
Tomic B.[2]
6-34-66-4
Andrade A.[6]
Ficovich J.[1]
1-67-57-64
Galarneau A.[4]
Winter E.
5-77-57-5
Pacheco Mendez R.[3]
Kozlov S.[8]
6-46-2
R16
Ficovich J.[1]
Nefve A.
6-36-3
Andrade A.[6]
Rodrigues N.
6-46-4
Galarneau A.[4]
Kingsley C.
6-43-66-3
Winter E.
Martin A.[7]
6-23-66-3
Pacheco Mendez R.[3]
Ayeni O.
3-66-16-4
Gojo B.[5]
Jones B.
6-34-2
Kozlov S.[8]
Poling K.
6-47-64
Tomic B.[2]
Brouwer G.
4-66-36-2
R32
Kozlov S.[8]
Mccormick T.
6-36-746-4
Ficovich J.[1]
Fishback R.
6-46-4
Nefve A.
Sau Franco A.
7-636-4
Andrade A.[6]
Gomez J.
6-26-3
Winter E.
Dickerson R.
6-27-5
Martin A.[7]
Aguilar J.
6-26-3
Pacheco Mendez R.[3]
Dalmasso G.
6-26-1
Gojo B.[5]
Mena F.
6-776-47-65
Jones B.
De Alba R.
6-17-69
Tomic B.[2]
Rubio Fierros A.
7-666-3
Rodrigues N.
Tobon M.
6-24-3
Ayeni O.
Martin D.
7-50-0
Galarneau A.[4]
Hardt N.
6-36-0
Kingsley C.
Baadi T.
6-36-0
Poling K.
Bicknell B.
4-67-56-1
Brouwer G.
Gima S.
6-26-3