Coleman Wong vs Nuno Borges — Delray Beach Round of 32

Delray Beach · ATP · Round of 32
HKG
Coleman Wong
#108ATP
1602ELO
1593Hard ELO
$287kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 February 2026
hard
Nuno Borges
POR
Nuno Borges
#48ATP
1769ELO
1714Hard ELO
$811kYTD
$5.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLWL
Wong C.
7-6 4-6 6-3
Borges N.
Wong C.
77462
Borges N.
65631

Coleman Wong defeated Nuno Borges 7-6 4-6 6-3 in the Delray Beach round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Nuno Borges came in ranked #48.

Key context

  • Match story: Coleman Wong closed it out in three sets, 7–6 4–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wong C.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Borges N.

Borges N.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Wong C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Wong C.Borges N.
37
Serve
36
34
Return
16

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Wong C.Borges N.
1st serve in·Even
61%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
65%
65%
Return points won·Even
36%
34%
Break points saved·Even
64%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.2
6.2
Double faults / match·Even
2.0
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (37 vs 22). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wong C.Borges N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
42
77
Break points saved·Slight edge
91
98
Break points won·Dominant
5
54
Deciding sets·Dominant
43
96
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
88
71

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wong C.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Borges N.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.5Hard Elo 1593
Surface ELO
5.5+121 Hard Elo edge
4.6Overall Elo 1602
ELO gap
5.4Overall Elo 1769
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
4.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wong C.Borges N.
Freshness·Slight edge
100
92

Wong C.: 20 days rest · Borges N.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Korda S.
Paul T.[5]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Paul T.[5]
Tien L.[4]
4-66-46-3
Korda S.
Cobolli F.[3]
7-616-1
Quarter-finals
Cobolli F.[3]
Wong C.
7-56-776-2
Korda S.
Ruud C.[2]
4-66-26-2
Tien L.[4]
Tiafoe F.[8]
7-653-67-5
Paul T.[5]
Fritz T.[1]
6-46-3
R16
Cobolli F.[3]
Atmane T.
7-56-4
Tien L.[4]
Kecmanovic M.
6-46-747-65
Fritz T.[1]
Jodar R.
7-646-4
Ruud C.[2]
Giron M.
4-67-666-4
Tiafoe F.[8]
Svajda Z.
6-43-67-5
Wong C.
Nakashima B.[7]
6-47-64
Paul T.[5]
Walton A.
7-6116-3
Korda S.
Michelsen A.
6-37-66
R32
Nakashima B.[7]
Cilic M.
7-647-65
Paul T.[5]
Moutet C.
4-66-36-4
Walton A.
Diallo G.
7-646-3
Wong C.
Borges N.
7-654-66-3
Kecmanovic M.
Bellucci M.
6-16-4
Tiafoe F.[8]
Hijikata R.
6-46-4
Atmane T.
Kypson P.
6-32-66-4
Svajda Z.
Kovacevic A.
7-646-3
Giron M.
Shimabukuro S.
6-37-5
Michelsen A.
Vacherot V.[6]
7-646-4
Jodar R.
Quinn E.
6-26-3
Korda S.
Mcdonald M.
6-47-5