Nishesh Basavareddy vs Ugo Blanchet — Lille CH Round of 32

Lille CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Nishesh Basavareddy
#135ATP
1722ELO
1681Hard ELO
$365kYTD
$1.5MCAREER
21 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 February 2026
hard
FRA
Ugo Blanchet
#170ATP
1521ELO
1546Hard ELO
$119kYTD
$989kCAREER
27 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLWWL
Basavareddy N.
6-2 6-2
Blanchet U.
Basavareddy N.
662
Blanchet U.
220

Nishesh Basavareddy defeated Ugo Blanchet 6-2 6-2 in the Lille CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Nishesh Basavareddy came in ranked #135.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Basavareddy N.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Blanchet U.

Blanchet U.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Basavareddy N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Basavareddy N.Blanchet U.
20
Serve
—
32
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Basavareddy N.Blanchet U.
1st serve in·Even
55%
53%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Even
62%
65%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
35%
Break points saved·Even
66%
67%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.4
5.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.5
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (28 vs 24). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Basavareddy N.Blanchet U.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
76
34
Break points saved·Even
90
89
Break points won·Dominant
49
15
Deciding sets·Dominant
93
12
Tiebreaks·Even
92
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Basavareddy N.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Blanchet U.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.7+134 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.3Hard Elo 1546
7.5Overall Elo 1722
ELO gap
2.5Overall Elo 1521
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
5.1
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.5
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Van Assche L.[7]
Blockx A.[4]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Blockx A.[4]
Kym J.
6-37-64
Van Assche L.[7]
Kouame M.
6-16-1
Quarter-finals
Kouame M.
Basavareddy N.
6-36-3
Kym J.
Droguet T.[6]
6-45-76-2
Blockx A.[4]
Bonzi B.[8]
6-36-4
Van Assche L.[7]
Chidekh C.
6-26-3
R16
Kym J.
Landaluce M.
6-46-3
Bonzi B.[8]
Engel J.
6-26-2
Kouame M.
Schwaerzler J.
6-36-4
Basavareddy N.
Gaston H.[3]
6-46-1
Chidekh C.
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
7-657-64
Droguet T.[6]
Skatov T.
7-666-2
Blockx A.[4]
Bouquier A.
6-17-63
Van Assche L.[7]
Kukushkin M.
6-36-2
R32
Landaluce M.
Misolic F.[1]
6-11-1
Kouame M.
Dodig M.
6-46-2
Droguet T.[6]
Sachko V.
6-04-66-3
Blockx A.[4]
Safiullin R.
6-26-2
Bonzi B.[8]
Glinka D.
6-46-4
Schwaerzler J.
Goffin D.[5]
4-66-36-4
Chidekh C.
Fearnley J.[2]
6-32-66-2
Kym J.
Harris L.
5-77-666-4
Gaston H.[3]
Ofner S.
6-23-66-4
Van Assche L.[7]
Riedi L.
3-67-626-4
Kukushkin M.
Zeppieri G.
6-36-1
Basavareddy N.
Blanchet U.
6-26-2
Skatov T.
Hemery C.
6-16-3
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Holmgren A.
6-37-5
Bouquier A.
Coppejans K.
7-50-67-5
Engel J.
Massard L.
7-656-3