Ioannis Xilas vs Eric Vanshelboim — Chennai CH Round of 16

Chennai CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
GRE
Ioannis Xilas
#351ATP
1337ELO
1336Hard ELO
25 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 February 2026
hard
UKR
Eric Vanshelboim
#483ATP
24 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWL
Xilas I.
6-3 6-4
Vanshelboim E.
Xilas I.
662
Vanshelboim E.
340

Ioannis Xilas defeated Eric Vanshelboim 6-3 6-4 in the Chennai CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Ioannis Xilas closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Xilas I.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Vanshelboim E.

Vanshelboim E.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Xilas I.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Xilas I.Vanshelboim E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
71%
1st serve points won·Even
62%
64%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
48%
Service points won·Even
59%
59%
Return points won·Even
41%
40%
Break points saved·Even
47%
51%
Aces / match·Slight edge
0.8
1.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.2
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (13 vs 9). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Xilas I.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 77 days (−1.2)
Vanshelboim E.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
4.9
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Xilas I.Vanshelboim E.
Freshness·
96
—

Xilas I.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Ferreira Silva F.[6]
Gomez F.[2]
6-46-7106-4
Semi-finals
Ferreira Silva F.[6]
Simakin I.[4]
6-46-2
Gomez F.[2]
Kasnikowski M.
6-32-67-5
Quarter-finals
Gomez F.[2]
Yevseyev D.
6-36-4
Ferreira Silva F.[6]
Xilas I.
6-26-4
Simakin I.[4]
Bar Biryukov P.
7-654-67-5
Kasnikowski M.
Castelnuovo L.
6-37-65
R16
Xilas I.
Vanshelboim E.
6-36-4
Ferreira Silva F.[6]
Ajdukovic D.
6-36-4
Simakin I.[4]
Sekulic P.
4-67-57-61
Bar Biryukov P.
Nagal S.[8]
4-67-626-3
Kasnikowski M.
Rawat S.
6-26-3
Castelnuovo L.
Crawford O.[3]
1-66-37-65
Gomez F.[2]
Carboni L.
6-36-4
Yevseyev D.
Mukund S.
3-66-26-3
R32
Vanshelboim E.
Vishal Balsekar A.
6-06-0
Ajdukovic D.
Binda A.
6-46-4
Ferreira Silva F.[6]
Singh K.
6-46-4
Bar Biryukov P.
Eqbal I.
6-36-4
Nagal S.[8]
Gill F.
1-66-16-3
Rawat S.
Noguchi R.[5]
2-66-36-2
Kasnikowski M.
Lakshmanan A.
7-56-2
Castelnuovo L.
Leong M.
6-46-0
Crawford O.[3]
Singh D.
7-663-67-5
Mukund S.
Sinha N.
7-56-3
Gomez F.[2]
Sureshkumar M.
6-16-2
Yevseyev D.
Bax F.[7]
5-76-43-2
Carboni L.
Dev S.
6-20-0
Sekulic P.
Gray A.
6-37-69
Xilas I.
Clarke J.[1]
6-46-4
Simakin I.[4]
Dhamne M.
6-36-2