Federica Urgesi vs Dune Vaissaud — W50 Grenoble Round of 32

W50 Grenoble · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA
Federica Urgesi
#287WTA
1546ELO
1401Hard ELO
21 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLLW
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 February 2026
hard
FRA
Dune Vaissaud
#571WTA
19 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWWWW
Urgesi F.
6-3 6-1
Vaissaud D.
Urgesi F.
662
Vaissaud D.
31–

Federica Urgesi defeated Dune Vaissaud 6-3 6-1 in the W50 Grenoble round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Urgesi F.serving41% hold

wins 46% of points on serve vs Vaissaud D.

Vaissaud D.serving45% hold

wins 48% of points on serve vs Urgesi F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Urgesi F.Vaissaud D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
69%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
60%
60%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
48%
Service points won·Even
56%
55%
Return points won·Even
48%
51%
Break points saved·Slight edge
50%
44%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.0
1.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.8
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (25 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Urgesi F.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Vaissaud D.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.3
Surface form
6.0
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.0
3-set count
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Urgesi F.Vaissaud D.
Freshness·
—
94

Vaissaud D.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Naef C.
Vandromme J.
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Naef C.
Podrez V.
4-66-26-3
Vandromme J.
Grant T.
7-656-4
Quarter-finals
Naef C.
Yao X.
6-06-2
Podrez V.
Rosatello C.
6-16-4
Grant T.
Nahimana S.
6-26-2
Vandromme J.
Klugman H.
6-47-610
R16
Podrez V.
Mikulskyte J.
6-46-4
Naef C.
Yang Y.
6-26-1
Yao X.
Urgesi F.
6-24-66-4
Nahimana S.
Ristic M.
7-56-3
Vandromme J.
Nguyen Tan L.
6-15-76-2
Grant T.
Kazionova E.
7-656-2
Rosatello C.
Berecoechea N.
2-66-37-68
Klugman H.
Dodin O.
3-67-56-2
R32
Nahimana S.
Lee E.
6-46-2
Ristic M.
Ce G.
7-636-4
Yao X.
Akli A.
6-33-66-3
Berecoechea N.
Bertea E.
6-16-1
Klugman H.
Bassols Ribera M.
6-27-610
Vandromme J.
Tan H.
6-46-3
Dodin O.
Cakarevic S.
7-56-3
Nguyen Tan L.
Bartashevich Y.
7-56-1
Urgesi F.
Vaissaud D.
6-36-1
Naef C.
Tubello A.
7-56-1
Podrez V.
Cortez Llorca L.
6-16-3
Grant T.
Fiquet T.
6-36-4
Yang Y.
Rus A.
6-36-4
Kazionova E.
Leonard M.
6-746-26-3
Rosatello C.
Lew Yan Foon A.
6-37-5
Mikulskyte J.
Belgraver J.
6-37-5