Celine Naef vs Xinxin Yao — W50 Grenoble Quarter-final

W50 Grenoble · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
SUI
Celine Naef
#211WTA
1671ELO
1653Hard ELO
21 yrs · 167 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWWLW
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 February 2026
hard
CHN
Xinxin Yao
#290WTA
1450ELO
1440Hard ELO
22 yrs · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLLWWL
Naef C.
6-0 6-2
Yao X.
Naef C.
662
Yao X.
02–

Celine Naef defeated Xinxin Yao 6-0 6-2 in the W50 Grenoble quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Naef C.serving60% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Yao X.

Yao X.serving50% hold

wins 50% of points on serve vs Naef C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Naef C.Yao X.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
59%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
55%
Return points won·Even
45%
47%
Break points saved·Even
55%
54%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.0
0.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (28 vs 35). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Naef C.
7.6
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Yao X.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.3+213 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.7Hard Elo 1440
9.3Overall Elo 1671
ELO gap
0.7Overall Elo 1450
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.0
Surface form
3.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3-set count
4.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Naef C.Yao X.
Freshness·
100
—

Naef C.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Naef C.
Vandromme J.
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Naef C.
Podrez V.
4-66-26-3
Vandromme J.
Grant T.
7-656-4
Quarter-finals
Naef C.
Yao X.
6-06-2
Podrez V.
Rosatello C.
6-16-4
Grant T.
Nahimana S.
6-26-2
Vandromme J.
Klugman H.
6-47-610
R16
Podrez V.
Mikulskyte J.
6-46-4
Naef C.
Yang Y.
6-26-1
Yao X.
Urgesi F.
6-24-66-4
Nahimana S.
Ristic M.
7-56-3
Vandromme J.
Nguyen Tan L.
6-15-76-2
Grant T.
Kazionova E.
7-656-2
Rosatello C.
Berecoechea N.
2-66-37-68
Klugman H.
Dodin O.
3-67-56-2
R32
Nahimana S.
Lee E.
6-46-2
Ristic M.
Ce G.
7-636-4
Yao X.
Akli A.
6-33-66-3
Berecoechea N.
Bertea E.
6-16-1
Klugman H.
Bassols Ribera M.
6-27-610
Vandromme J.
Tan H.
6-46-3
Dodin O.
Cakarevic S.
7-56-3
Nguyen Tan L.
Bartashevich Y.
7-56-1
Urgesi F.
Vaissaud D.
6-36-1
Naef C.
Tubello A.
7-56-1
Podrez V.
Cortez Llorca L.
6-16-3
Grant T.
Fiquet T.
6-36-4
Yang Y.
Rus A.
6-36-4
Kazionova E.
Leonard M.
6-746-26-3
Rosatello C.
Lew Yan Foon A.
6-37-5
Mikulskyte J.
Belgraver J.
6-37-5