Celine Naef vs Jeline Vandromme — W50 Grenoble Final

W50 Grenoble · CHALLENGER · Final
SUI
Celine Naef
#211WTA
1671ELO
1653Hard ELO
21 yrs · 167 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWWLW
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 February 2026
hard
BEL
Jeline Vandromme
#129WTA
1646ELO
1658Hard ELO
18 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWLW
Naef C.
7-5 6-3
Vandromme J.
Naef C.
762
Vandromme J.
53–

Celine Naef defeated Jeline Vandromme 7-5 6-3 in the W50 Grenoble final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Jeline Vandromme came in ranked #129.

Key context

  • Match story: Celine Naef closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Naef C.serving55% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Vandromme J.

Vandromme J.serving55% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Naef C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Naef C.Vandromme J.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
47%
Service points won·Even
61%
58%
Return points won·Even
46%
49%
Break points saved·Even
55%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.1
1.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.9
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (28 vs 32). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Naef C.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Vandromme J.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.0
Surface form
6.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3-set count
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Naef C.Vandromme J.
Freshness·Dominant
100
55

Naef C.: 20 days rest · Vandromme J.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 99 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Naef C.
Vandromme J.
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Naef C.
Podrez V.
4-66-26-3
Vandromme J.
Grant T.
7-656-4
Quarter-finals
Naef C.
Yao X.
6-06-2
Podrez V.
Rosatello C.
6-16-4
Grant T.
Nahimana S.
6-26-2
Vandromme J.
Klugman H.
6-47-610
R16
Podrez V.
Mikulskyte J.
6-46-4
Naef C.
Yang Y.
6-26-1
Yao X.
Urgesi F.
6-24-66-4
Nahimana S.
Ristic M.
7-56-3
Vandromme J.
Nguyen Tan L.
6-15-76-2
Grant T.
Kazionova E.
7-656-2
Rosatello C.
Berecoechea N.
2-66-37-68
Klugman H.
Dodin O.
3-67-56-2
R32
Nahimana S.
Lee E.
6-46-2
Ristic M.
Ce G.
7-636-4
Yao X.
Akli A.
6-33-66-3
Berecoechea N.
Bertea E.
6-16-1
Klugman H.
Bassols Ribera M.
6-27-610
Vandromme J.
Tan H.
6-46-3
Dodin O.
Cakarevic S.
7-56-3
Nguyen Tan L.
Bartashevich Y.
7-56-1
Urgesi F.
Vaissaud D.
6-36-1
Naef C.
Tubello A.
7-56-1
Podrez V.
Cortez Llorca L.
6-16-3
Grant T.
Fiquet T.
6-36-4
Yang Y.
Rus A.
6-36-4
Kazionova E.
Leonard M.
6-746-26-3
Rosatello C.
Lew Yan Foon A.
6-37-5
Mikulskyte J.
Belgraver J.
6-37-5