Martin Landaluce vs Oleg Prihodko — Pau CH Round of 32

Pau CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Martin Landaluce
ESP
Martin Landaluce
1727ELO
1685Hard ELO
$742kYTD
$1.5MCAREER
20 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 February 2026
hard
Oleg Prihodko
UKR
Oleg Prihodko
#428ATP
1395ELO
1403Hard ELO
28 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWLLL
Landaluce M.
6-4 2-6 7-6
Prihodko O.
Landaluce M.
62772
Prihodko O.
46641

Martin Landaluce defeated Oleg Prihodko 6-4 2-6 7-6 in the Pau CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Martin Landaluce came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Landaluce M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Prihodko O.

Prihodko O.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Landaluce M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Landaluce M.Prihodko O.
1st serve in·Even
64%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
63%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.0
5.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.6
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (30 vs 13). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Landaluce M.Prihodko O.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
59
17
Break points saved·Clear edge
92
68
Break points won·Clear edge
17
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
14
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
58
64

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Landaluce M.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Prihodko O.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.1+282 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.9Hard Elo 1403
8.3Overall Elo 1727
ELO gap
1.7Overall Elo 1395
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
0.9
Surface form
10.0
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
10.010-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
4.6
4.0
3-set count
0.0
6.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0
5.0
Opponent rise

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Landaluce M.Prihodko O.
Freshness·Clear edge
97
75

Landaluce M.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Prihodko O.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 73 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Collignon R.[1]
Bonzi B.[7]
7-656-1
Semi-finals
Collignon R.[1]
Tabur C.
7-56-4
Bonzi B.[7]
Squire H.
7-666-4
Quarter-finals
Collignon R.[1]
Van Assche L.[6]
6-26-4
Tabur C.
Echargui M.[8]
6-746-26-4
Bonzi B.[7]
Bouquier A.
6-796-46-4
Squire H.
Shevchenko A.[2]
6-757-667-64
R16
Bonzi B.[7]
Riedi L.
6-37-64
Tabur C.
Landaluce M.
6-36-3
Bouquier A.
Nardi L.[4]
6-44-67-65
Van Assche L.[6]
Kolar Z.
1-66-36-4
Collignon R.[1]
Damm M.
7-657-65
Echargui M.[8]
Klein L.
6-26-2
Squire H.
Zeppieri G.
3-66-36-3
Shevchenko A.[2]
Glinka D.
6-36-776-1
R32
Klein L.
Added D.
5-2
Zeppieri G.
Goffin D.[5]
7-665-76-1
Squire H.
Kouame M.
6-37-5
Van Assche L.[6]
Kotov P.
6-33-0
Bonzi B.[7]
Kukushkin M.
5-77-637-63
Bouquier A.
Skatov T.
4-66-47-65
Echargui M.[8]
Engel J.
7-626-4
Riedi L.
Balshaw F.
6-706-36-2
Shevchenko A.[2]
Chidekh C.
6-47-66
Glinka D.
Lajal M.
6-34-3
Tabur C.
Blockx A.[3]
6-16-4
Landaluce M.
Prihodko O.
6-42-67-64
Nardi L.[4]
Kym J.
6-47-63
Collignon R.[1]
Zahraj P.
7-56-2
Damm M.
Bertola R.
7-56-3
Kolar Z.
Trotter J.
3-67-656-4