Luka Mikrut vs Giles Hussey — Tenerife 2 CH Round of 16

Tenerife 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
CRO3
Luka Mikrut
#172ATP
1597ELO
1443Hard ELO
$79kYTD
$252kCAREER
22 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 February 2026
hard
GBR
Giles Hussey
#258ATP
1584ELO
1517Hard ELO
29 yrs · 185 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWLWW
Mikrut L.
6-4 4-6 6-1
Hussey G.
Mikrut L.
6462
Hussey G.
4611

Luka Mikrut defeated Giles Hussey 6-4 4-6 6-1 in the Tenerife 2 CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Luka Mikrut came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–4 4–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mikrut L.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Hussey G.

Hussey G.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Mikrut L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mikrut L.Hussey G.
1st serve in·Even
58%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
56%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
36%
42%
Break points saved·Clear edge
68%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.2
3.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.6
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (13 vs 21). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mikrut L.Hussey G.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
54
45
Break points saved·Clear edge
77
57
Break points won·Dominant
29
57
Deciding sets·Even
81
78
Tiebreaks·Dominant
59
13

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mikrut L.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Hussey G.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.9Hard Elo 1443
Surface ELO
4.1+74 Hard Elo edge
7.2Overall Elo 1597
ELO gap
2.8Overall Elo 1584
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.4
Surface form
3.9
0.0Lost last 7
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mikrut L.Hussey G.
Freshness·
—
99

Hussey G.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Harris L.[6]
Moro Canas A.
7-57-5
Semi-finals
Moro Canas A.
Merida Aguilar D.[5]
6-23-67-5
Harris L.[6]
Llamas Ruiz P.[7]
6-47-65
Quarter-finals
Merida Aguilar D.[5]
Gentzsch T.
6-16-4
Moro Canas A.
Travaglia S.[4]
6-46-2
Llamas Ruiz P.[7]
Mikrut L.[3]
3-67-56-2
Harris L.[6]
Martin Tiffon P.
6-766-46-4
R16
Harris L.[6]
Damas M.
6-706-36-1
Gentzsch T.
Maestrelli F.[1]
6-46-4
Merida Aguilar D.[5]
Samuel T.
7-646-3
Travaglia S.[4]
Barton H.
6-16-3
Martin Tiffon P.
Huesler M.
6-24-66-3
Llamas Ruiz P.[7]
Berrettini J.
6-26-2
Mikrut L.[3]
Hussey G.
6-44-66-1
Moro Canas A.
Hassan B.
6-16-4
R32
Merida Aguilar D.[5]
Giustino L.
6-42-0
Maestrelli F.[1]
Callejon Hernando S.
4-66-26-4
Gentzsch T.
Willwerth B.
2-66-07-61
Samuel T.
Rincon D.
7-56-0
Travaglia S.[4]
Shelbayh A.
6-35-77-5
Barton H.
Peniston R.
7-684-66-3
Berrettini J.
Vasami J.
6-36-3
Hussey G.
Dodig M.
6-36-1
Mikrut L.[3]
Almazan Valiente I.
6-12-66-3
Harris L.[6]
Piraino G.
6-36-4
Huesler M.
Ofner S.[2]
6-36-766-3
Moro Canas A.
Loffhagen G.[8]
4-66-22-0
Hassan B.
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
7-666-4
Damas M.
Pereira T.
7-56-3
Martin Tiffon P.
Brancaccio R.
7-626-3
Llamas Ruiz P.[7]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-47-5