Quentin Halys vs Mees Rottgering — Rotterdam Round of 32

Rotterdam · ATP · Round of 32
Quentin Halys
FRA
Quentin Halys
#95ATP
1707ELO
1677Hard ELO
$694kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 February 2026
hard
NED
Mees Rottgering
#469ATP
1468ELO
1449Hard ELO
19 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWLWL
Halys Q.
3-6 6-1 6-1
Rottgering M.
Halys Q.
3662
Rottgering M.
6111

Quentin Halys defeated Mees Rottgering 3-6 6-1 6-1 in the Rotterdam round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Quentin Halys came in ranked #95.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Halys Q.serving87% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Rottgering M.

Rottgering M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Halys Q.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Halys Q.Rottgering M.
35
Serve
—
26
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Halys Q.Rottgering M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
34%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
67%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.8
4.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (35 vs 2). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Halys Q.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Rottgering M.
3.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Injury return: 91 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
7.7+228 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.3Hard Elo 1449
7.6Overall Elo 1707
ELO gap
2.4Overall Elo 1468
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.2
Surface form
2.9
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Halys Q.Rottgering M.
Freshness·
89
—

Halys Q.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
3°COvercast
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 97%
Final
De Minaur A.[1]
Auger Aliassime F.[2]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
De Minaur A.[1]
Humbert U.
6-46-3
Auger Aliassime F.[2]
Bublik A.[3]
6-16-2
Quarter-finals
De Minaur A.[1]
Van De Zandschulp B.
3-67-647-5
Bublik A.[3]
Munar J.
6-46-747-63
Humbert U.
Oconnell C.
6-46-1
Auger Aliassime F.[2]
Griekspoor T.[7]
7-626-2
R16
Oconnell C.
Norrie C.[6]
7-696-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Tsitsipas S.
6-47-64
De Minaur A.[1]
Wawrinka S.
6-46-2
Humbert U.
Den Ouden G.
6-46-3
Munar J.
Khachanov K.[5]
7-683-66-3
Auger Aliassime F.[2]
Medjedovic H.
6-46-4
Bublik A.[3]
Struff J.
7-624-66-3
Griekspoor T.[7]
Halys Q.
7-57-611
R32
Medjedovic H.
Bergs Z.
7-657-65
Oconnell C.
Royer V.
6-44-67-64
Griekspoor T.[7]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-46-4
Humbert U.
Medvedev D.[4]
7-643-66-3
Halys Q.
Rottgering M.
3-66-16-1
Struff J.
Grenier H.
6-06-4
Tsitsipas S.
Rinderknech A.[8]
7-56-3
Den Ouden G.
Fucsovics M.
7-656-1
Wawrinka S.
Boogaard T.
6-36-4
Khachanov K.[5]
De Jong J.
3-66-47-5
Van De Zandschulp B.
Pavlovic L.
7-656-3
De Minaur A.[1]
Fils A.
7-636-2
Auger Aliassime F.[2]
Popyrin A.
7-56-3
Munar J.
Budkov Kjaer N.
6-16-3
Bublik A.[3]
Hurkacz H.
6-727-617-5
Norrie C.[6]
Bautista Agut R.
7-636-1