Ryan Fishback vs Matt Kuhar — Baton Rouge CH Qualifying Round 2

Baton Rouge CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
USA3
Ryan Fishback
#755ATP
24 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 February 2026
hard
USA10
Matt Kuhar
#757ATP
30 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWLLW
Fishback R.
6-3 6-7 6-3
Kuhar M.
Fishback R.
66462
Kuhar M.
37731

Ryan Fishback defeated Matt Kuhar 6-3 6-7 6-3 in the Baton Rouge CH qualifying round 2 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Ryan Fishback closed it out in three sets, 6–3 6–7 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fishback R.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Kuhar M.

Kuhar M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Fishback R.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fishback R.Kuhar M.
1st serve in·Even
59%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
46%
Service points won·Even
57%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
46%
54%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.5
2.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.5
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (4 vs 9). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fishback R.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kuhar M.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.8
Surface form
6.3
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
6.7
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Q2
Ozolins K.
Jones B.[11]
7-56-2
Dostanic S.[2]
George B.
6-36-1
Fishback R.[3]
Kuhar M.[10]
6-36-746-3
Corwin F.[4]
Markovic S.
6-25-76-4
Schachter N.[12]
Kohlmann De Freitas E.
6-12-67-5
Loncarevic A.
Hohmann R.
6-24-66-4
Q1
Dostanic S.[2]
Bass F.
6-26-2
Loncarevic A.
Bigun K.[6]
7-647-64
George B.
Zhu E.[9]
5-77-637-61
Fishback R.[3]
Stirbu C.
6-16-4
Kuhar M.[10]
De Alba R.
6-46-0
Corwin F.[4]
Stoot N.
6-16-1
Markovic S.
Kirchheimer S.[7]
3-66-36-4
Kohlmann De Freitas E.
Dickerson R.[5]
6-27-5
Schachter N.[12]
Ribero F.
7-607-63
Hohmann R.
Covato M.[8]
4-66-16-4
Ozolins K.
Poling K.[1]
6-46-2
Jones B.[11]
Basel V.
3-66-26-2