Li Tu vs Blake Ellis — Brisbane 2 CH Round of 16

Brisbane 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
AUS
Li Tu
#464ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 February 2026
hard
AUS
Blake Ellis
#472ATP
1416ELO
1390Hard ELO
27 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLWW
Tu L.
6-4 6-4
Ellis B.
Tu L.
662
Ellis B.
440

Li Tu defeated Blake Ellis 6-4 6-4 in the Brisbane 2 CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Li Tu came in ranked #464, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Li Tu edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tu L.serving92% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Ellis B.

Ellis B.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tu L.Ellis B.
1st serve in·Even
60%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
65%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
32%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
69%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.8
11.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (22 vs 21). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tu L.Ellis B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
27
41
Break points saved·Even
82
79
Break points won·Slight edge
8
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
20
78
Tiebreaks·Dominant
64
38

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tu L.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Ellis B.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.6+81 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.4Hard Elo 1390
5.7Overall Elo 1488
ELO gap
4.3Overall Elo 1416
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
3.5
Surface form
7.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
5.2
4.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
Context
7.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tu L.Ellis B.
Freshness·
—
90

Ellis B.: 8 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Zhang Z.
Bolt A.[4]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Zhang Z.
Sakamoto R.[3]
6-16-4
Bolt A.[4]
Moriya H.
6-33-66-3
Quarter-finals
Sakamoto R.[3]
Tu L.
7-636-4
Bolt A.[4]
Blanch D.[8]
7-56-3
Moriya H.
Sweeny D.[2]
7-57-63
Zhang Z.
Matsuoka H.
6-37-5
R16
Blanch D.[8]
Weber A.
6-16-3
Matsuoka H.
Polmans M.
4-67-626-3
Zhang Z.
Uchiyama Y.[9]
6-47-67
Sakamoto R.[3]
Sinclair C.
7-56-3
Tu L.
Ellis B.
6-46-4
Moriya H.
Sach T.
6-766-06-4
Sweeny D.[2]
Imamura M.
6-36-2
Bolt A.[4]
Jasika O.
6-24-1
R32
Polmans M.
Mackenzie J.
7-52-66-1
Matsuoka H.
Delaney J.
6-46-4
Uchiyama Y.[9]
Hewitt C.
7-57-5
Sakamoto R.[3]
Mochizuki Y.
6-06-1
Sinclair C.
Hulme M.
5-77-646-4
Tu L.
Nakagawa N.
6-766-47-62
Weber A.
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-32-67-5
Jasika O.
Shiraishi H.
4-66-27-65
Moriya H.
Bouzige M.
6-46-4
Imamura M.
Dellavedova M.
3-66-46-3
Sweeny D.[2]
Daniel T.
7-56-4
Zhang Z.
Marinkov P.
7-646-3
Bolt A.[4]
Isomura K.
7-56-3
Ellis B.
Sun F.[7]
7-623-67-5
Blanch D.[8]
Denolly C.
6-47-5
Sach T.
Zhou Y.[6]
6-42-66-2