Clement Tabur vs Moez Echargui — Pau CH Quarter-final

Pau CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Clement Tabur
FRA
Clement Tabur
#189ATP
1607ELO
1573Hard ELO
$199kYTD
$640kCAREER
26 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 February 2026
hard
Moez Echargui
TUN8
Moez Echargui
#157ATP
1416ELO
1408Hard ELO
$171kYTD
$469kCAREER
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
Tabur C.
6-7 6-2 6-4
Echargui M.
Tabur C.
64662
Echargui M.
77241

Clement Tabur defeated Moez Echargui 6-7 6-2 6-4 in the Pau CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tabur C.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Echargui M.

Echargui M.serving75% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Tabur C.

Serve advantage — Tabur C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tabur C.Echargui M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
57%
Aces / match·Even
4.2
4.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (32 vs 22). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tabur C.Echargui M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
29
4
Break points saved·Dominant
74
48
Break points won·Clear edge
23
11
Deciding sets·Dominant
33
4
Tiebreaks·Even
40
42

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tabur C.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Echargui M.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.6+165 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.4Hard Elo 1408
6.4Overall Elo 1607
ELO gap
3.6Overall Elo 1416
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.2
Surface form
1.0
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
6.1
Minutes 14d
9.2
0.0
3-set count
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tabur C.Echargui M.
Freshness·Clear edge
78
100

Tabur C.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d) · Echargui M.: 17 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Collignon R.[1]
Bonzi B.[7]
7-656-1
Semi-finals
Collignon R.[1]
Tabur C.
7-56-4
Bonzi B.[7]
Squire H.
7-666-4
Quarter-finals
Collignon R.[1]
Van Assche L.[6]
6-26-4
Tabur C.
Echargui M.[8]
6-746-26-4
Bonzi B.[7]
Bouquier A.
6-796-46-4
Squire H.
Shevchenko A.[2]
6-757-667-64
R16
Bonzi B.[7]
Riedi L.
6-37-64
Tabur C.
Landaluce M.
6-36-3
Bouquier A.
Nardi L.[4]
6-44-67-65
Van Assche L.[6]
Kolar Z.
1-66-36-4
Collignon R.[1]
Damm M.
7-657-65
Echargui M.[8]
Klein L.
6-26-2
Squire H.
Zeppieri G.
3-66-36-3
Shevchenko A.[2]
Glinka D.
6-36-776-1
R32
Klein L.
Added D.
5-2
Zeppieri G.
Goffin D.[5]
7-665-76-1
Squire H.
Kouame M.
6-37-5
Van Assche L.[6]
Kotov P.
6-33-0
Bonzi B.[7]
Kukushkin M.
5-77-637-63
Bouquier A.
Skatov T.
4-66-47-65
Echargui M.[8]
Engel J.
7-626-4
Riedi L.
Balshaw F.
6-706-36-2
Shevchenko A.[2]
Chidekh C.
6-47-66
Glinka D.
Lajal M.
6-34-3
Tabur C.
Blockx A.[3]
6-16-4
Landaluce M.
Prihodko O.
6-42-67-64
Nardi L.[4]
Kym J.
6-47-63
Collignon R.[1]
Zahraj P.
7-56-2
Damm M.
Bertola R.
7-56-3
Kolar Z.
Trotter J.
3-67-656-4