Marin Cilic vs Ethan Quinn — Dallas Round of 16

Dallas · ATP · Round of 16
Marin Cilic
CRO
Marin Cilic
#62ATP
1800ELO
1762Hard ELO
$776kYTD
$33MCAREER
37 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 February 2026
hard
Ethan Quinn
USA
Ethan Quinn
#47ATP
1804ELO
1767Hard ELO
$724kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWLWL
Cilic M.
7-6 6-3
Quinn E.
Cilic M.
7762
Quinn E.
6430

Marin Cilic defeated Ethan Quinn 7-6 6-3 in the Dallas round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Ethan Quinn came in ranked #47, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Marin Cilic closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cilic M.serving92% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Quinn E.

Quinn E.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Cilic M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Cilic M.Quinn E.
57
Serve
37
10
Return
21

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cilic M.Quinn E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
80%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
67%
66%
Return points won·Even
35%
34%
Break points saved·Even
67%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.9
7.8
Double faults / match·Even
2.9
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (17 vs 28). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cilic M.Quinn E.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
76
71
Break points saved·Even
99
95
Break points won·Clear edge
41
19
Deciding sets·Even
94
98
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
87
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cilic M.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Quinn E.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.0Hard Elo 1762
Surface ELO
5.0+6 Hard Elo edge
5.0Overall Elo 1800
ELO gap
5.0Overall Elo 1804
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
5.1
0.0
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
3-set count
7.0
4.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Cilic M.Quinn E.
Freshness·Slight edge
98
93

Cilic M.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Quinn E.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Shelton B.[2]
Fritz T.[1]
3-66-37-5
Semi-finals
Fritz T.[1]
Cilic M.
7-657-63
Shelton B.[2]
Shapovalov D.[7]
4-66-47-64
Quarter-finals
Shapovalov D.[7]
Davidovich Fokina A.[3]
5-76-46-3
Shelton B.[2]
Kecmanovic M.
5-76-36-4
Fritz T.[1]
Korda S.
6-726-47-65
Cilic M.
Pinnington Jones J.
6-16-4
R16
Fritz T.[1]
Nakashima B.
6-36-4
Kecmanovic M.
Paul T.[5]
5-76-46-4
Pinnington Jones J.
Spizzirri E.
7-654-67-64
Shelton B.[2]
Mannarino A.
7-626-746-3
Davidovich Fokina A.[3]
Michelsen A.
6-46-4
Korda S.
Tiafoe F.[8]
7-56-1
Shapovalov D.[7]
Kovacevic A.
6-46-4
Cilic M.
Quinn E.
7-646-3
R32
Paul T.[5]
Brooksby J.
4-66-47-64
Spizzirri E.
Duckworth J.
6-26-4
Michelsen A.
Dimitrov G.
5-76-46-4
Kecmanovic M.
Shimabukuro S.
6-736-37-63
Nakashima B.
Bellucci M.
6-36-4
Mannarino A.
Walton A.
6-46-2
Kovacevic A.
Kypson P.
6-47-61
Fritz T.[1]
Giron M.
6-45-77-61
Davidovich Fokina A.[3]
Svajda Z.
6-47-61
Korda S.
Zheng M.
6-36-4
Tiafoe F.[8]
Atmane T.
4-66-26-2
Shelton B.[2]
Diallo G.
6-46-4
Pinnington Jones J.
Cobolli F.[4]
6-26-2
Quinn E.
Svajda T.
7-637-5
Shapovalov D.[7]
Jodar R.
6-16-2
Cilic M.
Tien L.[6]
7-57-64