Mia Ristic vs Gabriela Ce — W50 Grenoble Round of 32

W50 Grenoble · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SRB
Mia Ristic
#266WTA
1504ELO
1366Hard ELO
20 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWLLLLW
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 February 2026
hard
Gabriela Ce
BRA
Gabriela Ce
#328WTA
1324ELO
1256Hard ELO
33 yrs · 164 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLLLL
Ristic M.
7-6 6-4
Ce G.
Ristic M.
7762
Ce G.
634–

Mia Ristic defeated Gabriela Ce 7-6 6-4 in the W50 Grenoble round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ristic M.serving59% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Ce G.

Ce G.serving45% hold

wins 48% of points on serve vs Ristic M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ristic M.Ce G.
1st serve in·Even
69%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
60%
55%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
42%
Service points won·Slight edge
58%
51%
Return points won·Even
44%
45%
Break points saved·Slight edge
51%
46%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.6
0.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
0.8
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (26 vs 16). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ristic M.Ce G.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
19
29
Break points saved·Clear edge
35
15
Break points won·Clear edge
54
74
Deciding sets·Dominant
45
89
Tiebreaks·
—
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ristic M.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Ce G.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.5+110 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.5Hard Elo 1256
7.5Overall Elo 1504
ELO gap
2.5Overall Elo 1324
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
3.5
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Naef C.
Vandromme J.
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Naef C.
Podrez V.
4-66-26-3
Vandromme J.
Grant T.
7-656-4
Quarter-finals
Naef C.
Yao X.
6-06-2
Podrez V.
Rosatello C.
6-16-4
Grant T.
Nahimana S.
6-26-2
Vandromme J.
Klugman H.
6-47-610
R16
Podrez V.
Mikulskyte J.
6-46-4
Naef C.
Yang Y.
6-26-1
Yao X.
Urgesi F.
6-24-66-4
Nahimana S.
Ristic M.
7-56-3
Vandromme J.
Nguyen Tan L.
6-15-76-2
Grant T.
Kazionova E.
7-656-2
Rosatello C.
Berecoechea N.
2-66-37-68
Klugman H.
Dodin O.
3-67-56-2
R32
Nahimana S.
Lee E.
6-46-2
Ristic M.
Ce G.
7-636-4
Yao X.
Akli A.
6-33-66-3
Berecoechea N.
Bertea E.
6-16-1
Klugman H.
Bassols Ribera M.
6-27-610
Vandromme J.
Tan H.
6-46-3
Dodin O.
Cakarevic S.
7-56-3
Nguyen Tan L.
Bartashevich Y.
7-56-1
Urgesi F.
Vaissaud D.
6-36-1
Naef C.
Tubello A.
7-56-1
Podrez V.
Cortez Llorca L.
6-16-3
Grant T.
Fiquet T.
6-36-4
Yang Y.
Rus A.
6-36-4
Kazionova E.
Leonard M.
6-746-26-3
Rosatello C.
Lew Yan Foon A.
6-37-5
Mikulskyte J.
Belgraver J.
6-37-5