Clement Tabur vs Alexander Blockx — Pau CH Round of 32

Pau CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Clement Tabur
FRA
Clement Tabur
#189ATP
1607ELO
1573Hard ELO
$199kYTD
$640kCAREER
26 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 February 2026
hard
BEL3
Alexander Blockx
#36ATP
1906ELO
1793Hard ELO
$901kYTD
$1.8MCAREER
21 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
Tabur C.
6-1 6-4
Blockx A.
Tabur C.
662
Blockx A.
140

Clement Tabur defeated Alexander Blockx 6-1 6-4 in the Pau CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Alexander Blockx came in ranked #36, defending last year's round of 16. Clement Tabur extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-11-02MetzR16hardClement Tabur6-7(4) 7-6(6) 7-6(6)
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Tabur C.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Blockx A.

Blockx A.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Tabur C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Tabur C.Blockx A.
—
Serve
53
—
Return
42

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Tabur C.Blockx A.
1st serve in·Even
61%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
54%
Service points won·Even
65%
68%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
72%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.4
6.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (32 vs 34). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tabur C.Blockx A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
29
71
Break points saved·Clear edge
74
97
Break points won·Even
23
27
Deciding sets·Dominant
33
95
Tiebreaks·Dominant
40
87

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tabur C.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Blockx A.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.3Hard Elo 1573
Surface ELO
7.7+220 Hard Elo edge
1.4Overall Elo 1607
ELO gap
8.6Overall Elo 1906
10.0
H2H
0.0
4.2
Surface form
7.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.1
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tabur C.Blockx A.
Freshness·Clear edge
78
94

Tabur C.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d) · Blockx A.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Collignon R.[1]
Bonzi B.[7]
7-656-1
Semi-finals
Collignon R.[1]
Tabur C.
7-56-4
Bonzi B.[7]
Squire H.
7-666-4
Quarter-finals
Collignon R.[1]
Van Assche L.[6]
6-26-4
Tabur C.
Echargui M.[8]
6-746-26-4
Bonzi B.[7]
Bouquier A.
6-796-46-4
Squire H.
Shevchenko A.[2]
6-757-667-64
R16
Bonzi B.[7]
Riedi L.
6-37-64
Tabur C.
Landaluce M.
6-36-3
Bouquier A.
Nardi L.[4]
6-44-67-65
Van Assche L.[6]
Kolar Z.
1-66-36-4
Collignon R.[1]
Damm M.
7-657-65
Echargui M.[8]
Klein L.
6-26-2
Squire H.
Zeppieri G.
3-66-36-3
Shevchenko A.[2]
Glinka D.
6-36-776-1
R32
Klein L.
Added D.
5-2
Zeppieri G.
Goffin D.[5]
7-665-76-1
Squire H.
Kouame M.
6-37-5
Van Assche L.[6]
Kotov P.
6-33-0
Bonzi B.[7]
Kukushkin M.
5-77-637-63
Bouquier A.
Skatov T.
4-66-47-65
Echargui M.[8]
Engel J.
7-626-4
Riedi L.
Balshaw F.
6-706-36-2
Shevchenko A.[2]
Chidekh C.
6-47-66
Glinka D.
Lajal M.
6-34-3
Tabur C.
Blockx A.[3]
6-16-4
Landaluce M.
Prihodko O.
6-42-67-64
Nardi L.[4]
Kym J.
6-47-63
Collignon R.[1]
Zahraj P.
7-56-2
Damm M.
Bertola R.
7-56-3
Kolar Z.
Trotter J.
3-67-656-4