Martin Damm vs Remy Bertola — Pau CH Round of 32

Pau CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Martin Damm
USA
Martin Damm
#106ATP
1706ELO
1657Hard ELO
$338kYTD
$910kCAREER
22 yrs · 203 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 February 2026
hard
Remy Bertola
SUI
Remy Bertola
#187ATP
1579ELO
1528Hard ELO
$107kYTD
$341kCAREER
27 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWWW
Damm M.
7-5 6-3
Bertola R.
Damm M.
762
Bertola R.
530

Martin Damm defeated Remy Bertola 7-5 6-3 in the Pau CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Martin Damm came in ranked #106.

Key context

  • Match story: Martin Damm closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Damm M.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Bertola R.

Bertola R.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Damm M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Damm M.Bertola R.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
69%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
32%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
12.1
4.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.9
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (33 vs 31). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Damm M.Bertola R.
Clutch Rating·Even
26
30
Break points saved·Clear edge
93
70
Break points won·Slight edge
1
12
Deciding sets·Dominant
5
37
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
84
62

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Damm M.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Bertola R.
3.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
7.1+129 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.9Hard Elo 1528
7.5Overall Elo 1706
ELO gap
2.5Overall Elo 1579
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.6
Surface form
5.6
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
1.5
Minutes 14d
4.3
0.0
3-set count
0.0
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Damm M.Bertola R.
Freshness·Even
89
93

Damm M.: 10 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Bertola R.: 3 days rest · 1 match, 15 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Collignon R.[1]
Bonzi B.[7]
7-656-1
Semi-finals
Collignon R.[1]
Tabur C.
7-56-4
Bonzi B.[7]
Squire H.
7-666-4
Quarter-finals
Collignon R.[1]
Van Assche L.[6]
6-26-4
Tabur C.
Echargui M.[8]
6-746-26-4
Bonzi B.[7]
Bouquier A.
6-796-46-4
Squire H.
Shevchenko A.[2]
6-757-667-64
R16
Bonzi B.[7]
Riedi L.
6-37-64
Tabur C.
Landaluce M.
6-36-3
Bouquier A.
Nardi L.[4]
6-44-67-65
Van Assche L.[6]
Kolar Z.
1-66-36-4
Collignon R.[1]
Damm M.
7-657-65
Echargui M.[8]
Klein L.
6-26-2
Squire H.
Zeppieri G.
3-66-36-3
Shevchenko A.[2]
Glinka D.
6-36-776-1
R32
Klein L.
Added D.
5-2
Zeppieri G.
Goffin D.[5]
7-665-76-1
Squire H.
Kouame M.
6-37-5
Van Assche L.[6]
Kotov P.
6-33-0
Bonzi B.[7]
Kukushkin M.
5-77-637-63
Bouquier A.
Skatov T.
4-66-47-65
Echargui M.[8]
Engel J.
7-626-4
Riedi L.
Balshaw F.
6-706-36-2
Shevchenko A.[2]
Chidekh C.
6-47-66
Glinka D.
Lajal M.
6-34-3
Tabur C.
Blockx A.[3]
6-16-4
Landaluce M.
Prihodko O.
6-42-67-64
Nardi L.[4]
Kym J.
6-47-63
Collignon R.[1]
Zahraj P.
7-56-2
Damm M.
Bertola R.
7-56-3
Kolar Z.
Trotter J.
3-67-656-4