Keegan Smith vs Tyler Zink — Cleveland CH Round of 32

Cleveland CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Keegan Smith
#204ATP
1421ELO
1395Hard ELO
28 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 2 February 2026
hard
USA
Tyler Zink
#326ATP
1371ELO
1351Hard ELO
25 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWWLW
Smith K.
6-3 6-7 7-6
Zink T.
Smith K.
665772
Zink T.
377631

Keegan Smith defeated Tyler Zink 6-3 6-7 7-6 in the Cleveland CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Keegan Smith closed it out in three sets, 6–3 6–7 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Smith K.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Zink T.

Zink T.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Smith K.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Smith K.Zink T.
1st serve in·Clear edge
75%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
54%
Service points won·Even
67%
64%
Return points won·Even
35%
39%
Break points saved·Even
68%
65%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.7
5.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.8
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (30 vs 28). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Smith K.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Zink T.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.5+44 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.5Hard Elo 1351
4.5Overall Elo 1421
ELO gap
5.5Overall Elo 1371
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
5.8
Surface form
2.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
6.6
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
8.5

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Smith K.Zink T.
Freshness·Even
81
85

Smith K.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d) · Zink T.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 39 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Smith C.[2]
Gojo B.
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Gojo B.
Sheehy J.
6-37-68
Smith C.[2]
Smith K.
7-646-1
Quarter-finals
Gojo B.
Vandecasteele Q.
6-46-4
Smith K.
Kozlov S.[7]
6-36-2
Smith C.[2]
Dostanic S.
6-47-64
Sheehy J.
Milavsky D.
7-646-707-66
R16
Smith K.
Ghibaudo A.
7-647-5
Dostanic S.
Langmo C.
6-36-786-4
Smith C.[2]
Jones B.
6-17-5
Milavsky D.
Martin D.
7-616-3
Sheehy J.
Martin A.[6]
7-636-3
Gojo B.
Boyer T.[3]
6-46-2
Kozlov S.[7]
Perot R.
7-653-66-3
Vandecasteele Q.
Boulais J.
6-26-4
R32
Kozlov S.[7]
Stebe C.
3-66-26-3
Martin D.
Shimabukuro S.[1]
6-36-4
Milavsky D.
Bigun K.
6-46-3
Martin A.[6]
Ilagan A.
7-673-67-5
Gojo B.
Kennedy J.
6-06-0
Boulais J.
Battle L.
6-36-4
Vandecasteele Q.
Cassone M.[5]
7-626-3
Perot R.
Friend J.
6-24-66-3
Ghibaudo A.
Tomic B.[4]
6-16-3
Langmo C.
Rybakov A.[8]
7-666-3
Dostanic S.
Kuhar M.
6-16-2
Jones B.
Shah A.
4-66-36-4
Smith C.[2]
Kingsley C.
3-67-666-4
Sheehy J.
Poling K.
7-617-64
Boyer T.[3]
Johns G.
6-46-4
Smith K.
Zink T.
6-36-757-63